Before and after study of bar workers' perceptions of the impact of smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland.
Mullally, Bernie J
AffiliationDepartment of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland. email@example.com
Attitude to Health
Health Care Surveys
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
MetadataShow full item record
CitationBefore and after study of bar workers' perceptions of the impact of smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland. 2007, 7:131 BMC Public Health
JournalBMC public health
AbstractBACKGROUND: Objectives: To compare support for, and perceptions of, the impacts of smoke-free workplace legislation among bar workers in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) pre- and post-implementation, and to identify predictors of support for the legislation. METHODS: Setting: Public houses (pubs) in three areas of the ROI. Design: Comparisons pre- and post-implementation of smoke-free workplace legislation. Participants: From a largely non-random selection, 288 bar workers volunteered for the baseline survey; 220 were followed up one year later (76.4%). Outcome measures: Level of support for the legislation, attitude statements concerning potential impacts of the law and modelled predictors of support for the legislation. RESULTS: Pre-implementation 59.5% of participants supported the legislation, increasing to 76.8% post-implementation. Support increased among smokers by 27.3 percentage points from 39.4% to 66.7% (p < 0.001) and among non-smokers by 12.4% percentage points from 68.8% to 81.2% (p = 0.003).Pre-legislation three-quarters of participants agreed that the legislation would make bars more comfortable and was needed to protect workers' health. Post-legislation these proportions increased to over 90% (p < 0.001). However, negative perceptions also increased, particularly for perceptions that the legislation has a negative impact on business (from 50.9% to 62.7%, p = 0.008) and that fewer people would visit pubs (41.8% to 62.7%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for relevant covariates, including responses to the attitude statements, support for the ban increased two to three-fold post-implementation. Regardless of their views on the economic impact, most participants agreed, both pre- and post-implementation, that the legislation was needed to protect bar workers' health. CONCLUSION: Smoke-free legislation had the support of three-quarters of a large sample of bar workers in the ROI. However, this group holds complex sets of both positive and negative perspectives on the legislation. Of particular importance is that negative economic perceptions did not diminish the widely held perception that the ban is needed to protect workers' health.
- Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study.
- Authors: Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B, Mullally BJ, Pursell L, Kelly A, Bonner B, D'Eath M, McConnell B, McLaughlin JP, O'Donovan D, O'kane E, Perry IJ
- Issue date: 2005 Nov 12
- Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey.
- Authors: Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeill A, Anderson S, Cummings KM, Allwright S, Mulcahy M, Howell F, Clancy L, Thompson ME, Connolly G, Driezen P
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland.
- Authors: Hilton S, Semple S, Miller BG, MacCalman L, Petticrew M, Dempsey S, Naji A, Ayres JG
- Issue date: 2007 Aug 14
- Impact of the Irish smoking ban on sales in bars using a large business-level data set from 1999 to 2007.
- Authors: Cornelsen L, Normand C
- Issue date: 2014 Sep
- Responding to change: how did bar workers adapt to the smoke-free legislation in Scotland?
- Authors: Eadie DR, MacAskill SG, Heim D, Hastings GB
- Issue date: 2010 Feb