Factors influencing general practitioner referral of patients developing end-stage renal failure: a standardised case-analysis study.
AffiliationDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain, PO Box 15503, Manama, Bahrain. email@example.com
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Interviews as Topic
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Physician's Practice Patterns
Referral and Consultation
MetadataShow full item record
CitationFactors influencing general practitioner referral of patients developing end-stage renal failure: a standardised case-analysis study. 2006, 6:114 BMC Health Serv Res
JournalBMC health services research
AbstractBACKGROUND: To understand why treatment referral rates for ESRF are lower in Ireland than in other European countries, an investigation of factors influencing general practitioner referral of patients developing ESRF was conducted. METHOD: Randomly selected general practitioners (N = 51) were interviewed using 32 standardised written patient scenarios to elicit referral strategies. Main outcome measures: General practitioner referral levels and thresholds for patients developing end-stage renal disease; referral routes (nephrologist vs other physicians); influence of patient age, marital status and co-morbidity on referral. RESULTS: Referral levels varied widely with the full range of cases (0-32; median = 15) referred by different doctors after consideration of first laboratory results. Less than half (44%) of cases were referred to a nephrologist. Patient age (40 vs 70 years), marital status, co-morbidity (none vs rheumatoid arthritis) and general practitioner prior specialist renal training (yes or no) did not influence referral rates. Many patients were not referred to a specialist at creatinine levels of 129 micromol/l (47% not referred) or 250 micromol/l (45%). While all patients were referred at higher levels (350 and 480 micromol/l), referral to a nephrologist decreased in likelihood as scenarios became more complex; 28% at 129 micromol/l creatinine; 28% at 250 micromol/l; 18% at 350 micromol/l and 14% at 480 micromol/l. Referral levels and routes were not influenced by general practitioner age, sex or practice location. Most general practitioners had little current contact with chronic renal patients (mean number in practice = 0.7, s.d. = 1.3). CONCLUSION: The very divergent management patterns identified highlight the need for guidance to general practitioners on appropriate management of this serious condition.
- Referral for dialysis in Ontario.
- Authors: Mendelssohn DC, Kua BT, Singer PA
- Issue date: 1995 Dec 11-25
- Referral patterns of primary care physicians for chronic kidney disease in general population and geriatric patients.
- Authors: Navaneethan SD, Kandula P, Jeevanantham V, Nally JV Jr, Liebman SE
- Issue date: 2010 Apr
- Most nephrologists are primary care providers for chronic dialysis patients: results of a national survey.
- Authors: Bender FH, Holley JL
- Issue date: 1996 Jul
- The detection of advanced chronic kidney disease by surveillance of elevated plasma creatinines--a five-year experience.
- Authors: Innes A
- Issue date: 2008 Aug
- Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.
- Authors: Forrest CB, Nutting PA, Starfield B, von Schrader S
- Issue date: 2002 Mar