Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGlynn, Liam G
dc.contributor.authorO'Riordan, Ciara
dc.contributor.authorMacFarlane, Anne
dc.contributor.authorNewell, John
dc.contributor.authorIglesias, Alberto A
dc.contributor.authorWhitford, David
dc.contributor.authorCantillon, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Andrew W
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-23T16:32:51Z
dc.date.available2010-03-23T16:32:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationResearch activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey. 2009, 10:33 BMC Fam Practen
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296
dc.identifier.pmid19432990
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2296-10-33
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/94738
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite increased investment in primary care research and development (R&D), the level of engagement of primary healthcare professionals with research remains poor. The aim of this study is to assess the level of research activity and capacity for research among primary healthcare professionals in a health authority of over one million people in a mixed urban/rural setting in the West of Ireland. METHODS: A questionnaire, incorporating the R+D Culture Index, was sent to primary healthcare professionals in the HSE Western Region. Baseline characteristics were analysed with the use of one-way ANOVA and Chi-square test and the dependence of R&D Culture Index score on all sixteen available covariates was examined using multiple regression and regression tree modelling. RESULTS: There was a 54% response rate to the questionnaire. Primary healthcare professionals appeared to have an interest in and awareness of the importance of research in primary care but just 15% were found to be research active in this study. A more positive attitude towards an R&D culture was associated with having had previous research training, being currently involved in research and with not being a general practitioner (GP) (p < 0.001), but much variability in the R&D culture index score remained unexplained. CONCLUSION: Despite awareness of the importance of R&D in primary care and investment therein, primary healthcare professionals remain largely unengaged with the R&D process. This study highlights the issues that need to be addressed in order to encourage a shift towards a culture of R&D in primary care: lack of research training particularly in basic research skills and increased opportunities for research involvement. The use of the R&D Culture Index may enable groups to be identified that may be more research interested and can therefore be targeted in any future R&D strategy.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Variance
dc.subject.meshAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject.meshData Collection
dc.subject.meshEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHealth Personnel
dc.subject.meshHealth Services Research
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshPrimary Health Care
dc.subject.meshResearch
dc.titleResearch activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey.en
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. liam.glynn@nuigalway.ieen
dc.identifier.journalBMC family practiceen
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-31T05:08:15Z
html.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite increased investment in primary care research and development (R&D), the level of engagement of primary healthcare professionals with research remains poor. The aim of this study is to assess the level of research activity and capacity for research among primary healthcare professionals in a health authority of over one million people in a mixed urban/rural setting in the West of Ireland. METHODS: A questionnaire, incorporating the R+D Culture Index, was sent to primary healthcare professionals in the HSE Western Region. Baseline characteristics were analysed with the use of one-way ANOVA and Chi-square test and the dependence of R&D Culture Index score on all sixteen available covariates was examined using multiple regression and regression tree modelling. RESULTS: There was a 54% response rate to the questionnaire. Primary healthcare professionals appeared to have an interest in and awareness of the importance of research in primary care but just 15% were found to be research active in this study. A more positive attitude towards an R&D culture was associated with having had previous research training, being currently involved in research and with not being a general practitioner (GP) (p < 0.001), but much variability in the R&D culture index score remained unexplained. CONCLUSION: Despite awareness of the importance of R&D in primary care and investment therein, primary healthcare professionals remain largely unengaged with the R&D process. This study highlights the issues that need to be addressed in order to encourage a shift towards a culture of R&D in primary care: lack of research training particularly in basic research skills and increased opportunities for research involvement. The use of the R&D Culture Index may enable groups to be identified that may be more research interested and can therefore be targeted in any future R&D strategy.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19432990.pdf
Size:
249.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record