Comparison of the Glidescope and Pentax AWS laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation.
Maharaj, Chrisen H
Malik, Muhammad A
O' Donnell, John
Higgins, Brendan D
Laffey, John G
AffiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland. email@example.com
MeSHAllied Health Personnel
MetadataShow full item record
CitationComparison of the Glidescope and Pentax AWS laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation. 2009, 9:9 BMC Emerg Med
JournalBMC emergency medicine
AbstractBACKGROUND: Intubation of the trachea in the pre-hospital setting may be lifesaving in severely ill and injured patients. However, tracheal intubation is frequently difficult to perform in this challenging environment, is associated with a lower success rate, and failed tracheal intubation constitutes an important cause of morbidity. Novel indirect laryngoscopes, such as the Glidescope and the AWS laryngoscopes may reduce this risk. METHODS: We compared the efficacy of these devices to the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by 25 Advanced Paramedics proficient in direct laryngoscopy, in a randomized, controlled, manikin study. Following brief didactic instruction with the Glidescope and the AWS laryngoscopes, each participant took turns performing laryngoscopy and intubation with each device, in an easy intubation scenario and following placement of a hard cervical collar, in a SimMan manikin. RESULTS: Both the Glidescope and the AWS performed better than the Macintosh, and demonstrate considerable promise in this context. The AWS had the least number of dental compressions in all three scenarios, and in the cervical spine immobilization scenario it required fewer maneuvers to optimize the view of the glottis. CONCLUSION: The Glidescope and AWS devices possess advantages over the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope when used by Advanced Paramedics in normal and simulated difficult intubation scenarios in this manikin study. Further studies are required to extend these findings to the clinical setting.
- Comparison of the Airtraq and Truview laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins.
- Authors: Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Butt I, Malik MA, O' Donnell J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2009 Feb 13
- A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study.
- Authors: Malik MA, Hassett P, Carney J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2009 Nov
- Tracheal intubation of a difficult airway using Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel.
- Authors: Liu L, Tanigawa K, Kusunoki S, Tamura T, Ota K, Yamaga S, Kida Y, Otani T, Sadamori T, Takeda T, Iwasaki Y, Hirohashi N
- Issue date: 2010 Apr 1
- Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study.
- Authors: Malik MA, O'Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2009 Jan
- Tracheal intubation by inexperienced medical residents using the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes--a manikin study.
- Authors: Maharaj CH, Ni Chonghaile M, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Issue date: 2006 Nov