Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGill, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorDowling, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Amanda J
dc.contributor.authorWatson, R William G
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-12T15:44:12Z
dc.date.available2010-03-12T15:44:12Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationEffects of cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP triple knockdown on prostate cancer cell susceptibility to apoptosis, cell survival and proliferation. 2009, 8:39 Mol. Canceren
dc.identifier.issn1476-4598
dc.identifier.pmid19549337
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1476-4598-8-39
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/94206
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Manipulating apoptotic resistance represents an important strategy for the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer. We hypothesised that the Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) Proteins may be mediating this resistance and knockdown of cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP would increase sensitivity to apoptosis. METHODS: cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP where knocked down either individually or in combination using siRNA in androgen independent prostate cancer PC-3 cells as confirmed by real-time PCR and western blotting. Cells were then treated with TRAIL, Etoposide, or Tunicamycin, and apoptosis assessed by PI DNA staining. Apoptosis was confirmed with Annexin V labelling and measurement of PARP cleavage, and was inhibited using the pan-caspase inhibitor, zVAD.fmk. Clonogenic assays and assessment of ID-1 expression by western blotting were used to measure recovery and proliferation. RESULTS: PC-3 are resistant to TRAIL induced apoptosis and have elevated expression of cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP. Combined knockdown sensitised PC-3 to TRAIL induced apoptosis, but not to Etoposide or Tunicmycin, with corresponding increases in caspase activity and PARP cleavage which was inhibited by ZVAD.fmk. Triple knock down decreased proliferation which was confirmed by decreased ID-1 expression. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous knock down of the IAPs not only sensitised the PC-3 to TRAIL but also inhibited their proliferation rates and clonogenic survival. The inability to alter sensitivity to other triggers of apoptosis suggests that this effect is specific for death receptor pathways and knock down might facilitate immune-surveillance mechanisms to counter cancer progression and, in combination with therapeutic approaches using TRAIL, could represent an important treatment strategy.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshApoptosis
dc.subject.meshCell Line, Tumor
dc.subject.meshCell Proliferation
dc.subject.meshCell Survival
dc.subject.meshData Interpretation, Statistical
dc.subject.meshEtoposide
dc.subject.meshGene Expression
dc.subject.meshGene Knockdown Techniques
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshInhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshPeptide Hydrolases
dc.subject.meshProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subject.meshRNA, Small Interfering
dc.subject.meshTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand
dc.subject.meshTunicamycin
dc.subject.meshX-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein
dc.titleEffects of cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP triple knockdown on prostate cancer cell susceptibility to apoptosis, cell survival and proliferation.en
dc.contributor.departmentUCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. cgill@hrb.ieen
dc.identifier.journalMolecular canceren
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-31T04:58:35Z
html.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Manipulating apoptotic resistance represents an important strategy for the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer. We hypothesised that the Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) Proteins may be mediating this resistance and knockdown of cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP would increase sensitivity to apoptosis. METHODS: cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP where knocked down either individually or in combination using siRNA in androgen independent prostate cancer PC-3 cells as confirmed by real-time PCR and western blotting. Cells were then treated with TRAIL, Etoposide, or Tunicamycin, and apoptosis assessed by PI DNA staining. Apoptosis was confirmed with Annexin V labelling and measurement of PARP cleavage, and was inhibited using the pan-caspase inhibitor, zVAD.fmk. Clonogenic assays and assessment of ID-1 expression by western blotting were used to measure recovery and proliferation. RESULTS: PC-3 are resistant to TRAIL induced apoptosis and have elevated expression of cIAP-1, cIAP-2 and XIAP. Combined knockdown sensitised PC-3 to TRAIL induced apoptosis, but not to Etoposide or Tunicmycin, with corresponding increases in caspase activity and PARP cleavage which was inhibited by ZVAD.fmk. Triple knock down decreased proliferation which was confirmed by decreased ID-1 expression. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous knock down of the IAPs not only sensitised the PC-3 to TRAIL but also inhibited their proliferation rates and clonogenic survival. The inability to alter sensitivity to other triggers of apoptosis suggests that this effect is specific for death receptor pathways and knock down might facilitate immune-surveillance mechanisms to counter cancer progression and, in combination with therapeutic approaches using TRAIL, could represent an important treatment strategy.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19549337.pdf
Size:
760.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record