Show simple item record

Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project.

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Hassan M
dc.contributor.authorAtterton, Benjamin P
dc.contributor.authorCrowe, Gillian G
dc.contributor.authorBarratta, Jaime L
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Mark
dc.contributor.authorViscusi, Eugene
dc.contributor.authorAdhikary, Sanjib
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Eric
dc.contributor.authorBoretsky, Karen
dc.contributor.authorBoublik, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBreslin, Dara S
dc.contributor.authorByrne, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorCh'ng, Alan
dc.contributor.authorChuan, Alwin
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Craig
dc.contributor.authorDaszkiewicz, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorDelbos, Alain
dc.contributor.authorDirzu, Dan Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorDmytriiev, Dmytro
dc.contributor.authorFennessy, Paul
dc.contributor.authorFischer, H Barrie J
dc.contributor.authorFrizelle, Henry
dc.contributor.authorGadsden, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorGautier, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Rajnish K
dc.contributor.authorGürkan, Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorHardman, Harold David
dc.contributor.authorHarrop-Griffiths, William
dc.contributor.authorHebbard, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorHlasny, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorIohom, Gabriella
dc.contributor.authorIp, Vivian H Y
dc.contributor.authorJeng, Christina L
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Rebecca L
dc.contributor.authorKalagara, Hari
dc.contributor.authorKinirons, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLansdown, Andrew Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorLeng, Jody C
dc.contributor.authorLim, Yean Chin
dc.contributor.authorLobo, Clara
dc.contributor.authorLudwin, Danielle B
dc.contributor.authorMacfarlane, Alan James Robert
dc.contributor.authorMachi, Anthony T
dc.contributor.authorMahon, Padraig
dc.contributor.authorMannion, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, David H
dc.contributor.authorMerjavy, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMiscuks, Aleksejs
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Christopher H
dc.contributor.authorMoka, Eleni
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Peter
dc.contributor.authorNgui, Ann
dc.contributor.authorNin, Olga C
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Brian D
dc.contributor.authorPawa, Amit
dc.contributor.authorPerlas, Anahi
dc.contributor.authorPorter, Steven
dc.contributor.authorPozek, John-Paul
dc.contributor.authorRebelo, Humberto C
dc.contributor.authorRoqués, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorSchroeder, Kristopher M
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Gary
dc.contributor.authorSchwenk, Eric S
dc.contributor.authorSermeus, Luc
dc.contributor.authorShorten, George
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, Karthikeyan
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Markus F
dc.contributor.authorTheodoraki, Kassiani
dc.contributor.authorTurbitt, Lloyd R
dc.contributor.authorValdés-Vilches, Luis Fernando
dc.contributor.authorVolk, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorWiesmann, T
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Sylvia H
dc.contributor.authorWolmarans, Morné
dc.contributor.authorWoodworth, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorWorek, Andrew K
dc.contributor.authorMoran, E M Louise
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-13T12:24:27Z
dc.date.available2024-11-13T12:24:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-22
dc.identifier.pmid35193970
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/rapm-2021-103136
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/643354
dc.descriptionBackground and objectives: Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods: Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results: Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion: By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectDelphi processen_US
dc.subjectanesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectDocumentationen_US
dc.subjectinternational consensusen_US
dc.subjectminimum standardsen_US
dc.subjectnerve blocken_US
dc.subjectneuraxialen_US
dc.subjectregional anesthesiaen_US
dc.titleRecommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1532-8651
dc.identifier.journalRegional anesthesia and pain medicineen_US
dc.source.journaltitleRegional anesthesia and pain medicine
dc.source.volume47
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage301
dc.source.endpage308
refterms.dateFOA2024-11-13T12:24:29Z
dc.source.countryEngland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
rapm-2021-103136.pdf
Size:
2.769Mb
Format:
PDF
Download

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.