Outcomes of Outpatient Versus Inpatient Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Issue Date
2024-09-16Keywords
foley catheter inductionhome induction of labour
home mechincal induction
hormonal induction at home
outpaitent induction of labour
Metadata
Show full item recordJournal
CureusDOI
10.7759/cureus.69535PubMed ID
39286471Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
2168-8184ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.7759/cureus.69535
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Related articles
- Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.
- Authors: Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Austin K, Welsh A, Challis D
- Issue date: 2013 Jan 29
- Outpatient versus inpatient balloon catheter insertion for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Authors: Abdelhakim AM, Shareef MA, AlAmodi AA, Aboshama RA, Fathi M, Abbas AM
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labor: a randomized trial.
- Authors: Wise MR, Thompson JMD, Battin M, McDougall J, Wilson J, Marriott J, Stitely M, Sadler L
- Issue date: 2023 Jun
- Outpatient versus inpatient cervix priming with Foley catheter: A randomized trial.
- Authors: Policiano C, Pimenta M, Martins D, Clode N
- Issue date: 2017 Mar
- Outpatient vs inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas with unripe cervixes: A randomized trial.
- Authors: Hamdan M, Shuhaina S, Hong JGS, Vallikkannu N, Zaidi SN, Tan YP, Tan PC
- Issue date: 2021 Nov
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Outpatient elective induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation (HOME INDUCTION): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase III, non-inferiority trial.Nicholson, Sarah; Flood, Karen; Dicker, Patrick; Molphy, Zara E; Smith, Orla T; Oprescu, Corina I; Wall, Eimear M; El Nimr, Sara N; Shanahan, Ita M; Kennedy, Bernard J; et al. (2024-07-17)
-
Guide to food safety training level 1 - induction skills and level 2 - additional skillsFood Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) (Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI), 2009)
-
Contact with existing adipose tissue is inductive for adipogenesis in matrigel.Kelly, John L; Findlay, Michael W; Knight, Kenneth R; Penington, Anthony; Thompson, Erik W; Messina, Aurora; Morrison, Wayne A; Bernard O'Brien Institute of Microsurgery, Melbourne, Australia. (Mary Ann Liebert Inc, 2006-07)The effect of adipose tissue on inductive adipogenesis within Matrigel (BD Biosciences) was assessed by using a murine chamber model containing a vascular pedicle. Three-chamber configurations that varied in the access to an adipose tissue source were used, including sealed- and open-chamber groups that had no access and limited access, respectively, to the surrounding adipose tissue, and a sealed-chamber group in which adipose tissue was placed as an autograft. All groups showed neovascularization, but varied in the amount of adipogenesis seen in direct relation to their access to preexisting adipose tissue: open chambers showed strong adipogenesis, whereas the sealed chambers had little or no adipose tissue; adipogenesis was restored in the autograft chamber group that contained 2- to 5-mg fat autografts. These showed significantly more adipogenesis than the sealed chambers with no autograft ( p < 0.01). Autografts with 1mg of fat were capable of producing adipogenesis but did so less consistently than the larger autografts. These findings have important implications for adipose tissue engineering strategies and for understanding de novo production of adipose tissue.