DOACs or VKAs or LMWH - What is the optimal regimen for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.contributor.author | Yamani, Naser | |
dc.contributor.author | Unzek, Samuel | |
dc.contributor.author | Almas, Talal | |
dc.contributor.author | Musheer, Adeena | |
dc.contributor.author | Ejaz, Arooba | |
dc.contributor.author | Paracha, Anousheh Awais | |
dc.contributor.author | Shahid, Izza | |
dc.contributor.author | Mookadam, Farouk | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-15T09:40:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-15T09:40:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-09 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2049-0801 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35860059 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103925 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10147/642175 | |
dc.description | A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling almost 7000 patients were included. Direct oral anticoagulants significantly reduced VTE Recurrence in cancer patients when compared to patients treated with LMWH or VKAs (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.83; P = 0.002; I2 = 26%). There were no statistically significant differences for major bleeding (HR 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-1.33; P = 0.50; I2 = 34%), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.91; P = 0.35; I2 = 66%), pulmonary embolism (HR 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.06; P = 0.10; I2 = 7%), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.12; P = 0.78; I2 = 1%), between DOACs and LMWH. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Anticoagulant | en_US |
dc.subject | Bleeding | en_US |
dc.subject | Cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Embolism | en_US |
dc.subject | MORTALITY | en_US |
dc.title | DOACs or VKAs or LMWH - What is the optimal regimen for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism? A systematic review and meta-analysis. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) | en_US |
dc.source.journaltitle | Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) | |
dc.source.volume | 79 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 103925 | |
dc.source.endpage | ||
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-07-15T09:40:24Z | |
dc.source.country | England |