Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoccolini, Federico
dc.contributor.authorKluger, Yoram
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Ernest E
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Ronald V
dc.contributor.authorCoimbra, Raul
dc.contributor.authorOrdoñez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorIvatury, Rao
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Andrew W
dc.contributor.authorBiffl, Walter
dc.contributor.authorSartelli, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorHecker, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorAnsaloni, Luca
dc.contributor.authorLeppaniemi, Ari
dc.contributor.authorReva, Viktor
dc.contributor.authorCivil, Ian
dc.contributor.authorVega, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorChiarugi, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorChichom-Mefire, Alain
dc.contributor.authorSakakushev, Boris
dc.contributor.authorPeitzman, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorChiara, Osvaldo
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Zidan, Fikri
dc.contributor.authorMaegele, Marc
dc.contributor.authorMiccoli, Mario
dc.contributor.authorChirica, Mircea
dc.contributor.authorKhokha, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorSugrue, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Gustavo P
dc.contributor.authorOtomo, Yasuhiro
dc.contributor.authorBaiocchi, Gian Luca
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Fausto
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T16:26:10Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T16:26:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-23
dc.identifier.pmid33622373
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/631974
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference RESULTS: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAnalysisen_US
dc.subjectDataen_US
dc.subjectMORBIDITYen_US
dc.subjectMORTALITYen_US
dc.subjectOutcomeen_US
dc.subjectperformanceen_US
dc.subjectplanningen_US
dc.subjectProducten_US
dc.subjectSystemen_US
dc.subjectWorlden_US
dc.titleTrauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1749-7922
dc.identifier.journalWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJESen_US
dc.description.peer-reviewpeer-reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES
dc.source.volume16
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage6
dc.source.endpage
refterms.dateFOA2022-05-24T16:26:11Z
dc.source.countryEngland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s13017-021-00350-7.pdf
Size:
1.171Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record