Authors
Dempsey, Eugene MBarrington, Keith J
Marlow, Neil
O'Donnell, Colm Patrick Finbarr
Miletin, Jan
Naulaers, Gunnar
Cheung, Po-Yin
Corcoran, John David
El-Khuffash, Afif Faisal
Boylan, Geraldine B
Livingstone, Vicki
Pons, Gerard
Macko, Jozef
Van Laere, David
Wiedermannova, Hana
Straňák, Zbyněk
Issue Date
2021-02-24Keywords
PREGNANCYcardiology
neonatology
PHARMACOLOGY
Metadata
Show full item recordJournal
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal editionDOI
10.1136/archdischild-2020-320241PubMed ID
33627329Abstract
Objective: To determine whether restricting the use of inotrope after diagnosis of low blood pressure (BP) in the first 72 hours of life affects survival without significant brain injury at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA) in infants born before 28 weeks of gestation. Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Caregivers were masked to group assignment. Setting: 10 sites across Europe and Canada. Participants: Infants born before 28 weeks of gestation were eligible if they had an invasive mean BP less than their gestational age that persisted for ≥15 min in the first 72 hours of life and a cerebral ultrasound free of significant (≥ grade 3) intraventricular haemorrhage. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to saline bolus followed by either a dopamine infusion (standard management) or placebo (5% dextrose) infusion (restrictive management). Primary outcome: Survival to 36 weeks of PMA without severe brain injury. Results: The trial terminated early due to significant enrolment issues (7.7% of planned recruitment). 58 infants were enrolled between February 2015 and September 2017. The two groups were well matched for baseline variables. In the standard group, 18/29 (62%) achieved the primary outcome compared with 20/29 (69%) in the restrictive group (p=0.58). Additional treatments for low BP were used less frequently in the standard arm (11/29 (38%) vs 19/29 (66%), p=0.038). Conclusion: Though this study lacked power, we did not detect major differences in clinical outcomes between standard or restrictive approach to treatment. These results will inform future studies in this area.Item Type
ArticleOther
Language
enEISSN
1468-2052ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/archdischild-2020-320241
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Management of hypotension in preterm infants (The HIP Trial): a randomised controlled trial of hypotension management in extremely low gestational age newborns.
- Authors: Dempsey EM, Barrington KJ, Marlow N, O'Donnell CP, Miletin J, Naulaers G, Cheung PY, Corcoran D, Pons G, Stranak Z, Van Laere D, HIP Consortium
- Issue date: 2014
- Blood pressure intervention levels in preterm infants: pilot randomised trial.
- Authors: Pereira SS, Sinha AK, Morris JK, Wertheim DF, Shah DK, Kempley ST
- Issue date: 2019 May
- Early inotropes use is associated with higher risk of death and/or severe brain injury in extremely premature infants.
- Authors: Abdul Aziz AN, Thomas S, Murthy P, Rabi Y, Soraisham A, Stritzke A, Kamaluddeen M, Al-Awad E, Mohammad K
- Issue date: 2020 Aug
- Dopamine versus epinephrine for cardiovascular support in low birth weight infants: analysis of systemic effects and neonatal clinical outcomes.
- Authors: Valverde E, Pellicer A, Madero R, Elorza D, Quero J, Cabañas F
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Cerebral oxygen saturation and autoregulation during hypotension in extremely preterm infants.
- Authors: Thewissen L, Naulaers G, Hendrikx D, Caicedo A, Barrington K, Boylan G, Cheung PY, Corcoran D, El-Khuffash A, Garvey A, Macko J, Marlow N, Miletin J, O'Donnell CPF, O'Toole JM, Straňák Z, Van Laere D, Wiedermannova H, Dempsey E
- Issue date: 2021 Aug