Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFerguson, John
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, Maurice
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-09T16:02:39Z
dc.date.available2021-07-09T16:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-21
dc.identifier.issn0778-7367
dc.identifier.pmid32704369
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13690-020-00442-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/629907
dc.descriptionBackground: In 1995, Eide and Gefeller introduced the concepts of sequential and average attributable fractions as methods to partition the risk of disease among differing exposures. In particular, sequential attributable fractions are interpreted in terms of an incremental reduction in disease prevalence associated with removing a particular risk factor from the population, having removed other risk factors. Clearly, both concepts are causal entities, but are not usually estimated within a causal inference framework. Methods: We propose causal definitions of sequential and average attributable fractions using the potential outcomes framework. To estimate these quantities in practice, we model exposure-exposure and exposure-disease interrelationships using a causal Bayesian network, assuming no unmeasured latent confounders. This allows us to model not only the direct impact of removing a risk factor on disease, but also the indirect impact through the effect on the prevalence of causally downstream risk factors that are typically ignored when calculating sequential and average attributable fractions. The procedure for calculating sequential attributable fractions involves repeated applications of Pearl's do-operator over a fitted Bayesian network, and simulation from the resulting joint probability distributions. Results: The methods are applied to the INTERSTROKE study, which was designed to quantify disease burden attributable to the major risk factors for stroke. The resulting sequential and average attributable fractions are compared with results from a prior estimation approach which uses a single logistic model and which does not properly account for differing causal pathways. Conclusions: In contrast to estimation using a single regression model, the proposed approaches allow consistent estimation of sequential, joint and average attributable fractions under general causal structures.en_US
dc.description.abstractWe propose causal definitions of sequential and average attributable fractions using the potential outcomes framework. To estimate these quantities in practice, we model exposure-exposure and exposure-disease interrelationships using a causal Bayesian network, assuming no unmeasured latent confounders. This allows us to model not only the direct impact of removing a risk factor on disease, but also the indirect impact through the effect on the prevalence of causally downstream risk factors that are typically ignored when calculating sequential and average attributable fractions. The procedure for calculating sequential attributable fractions involves repeated applications of Pearl's do-operator over a fitted Bayesian network, and simulation from the resulting joint probability distributions.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020.
dc.subjectAttributable fractionen_US
dc.subjectBayesian networken_US
dc.subjectCausal DAGen_US
dc.subjectCausal inferenceen_US
dc.subjectDo-operatoren_US
dc.subjectRISK FACTORSen_US
dc.subjectGENERAL DISEASESen_US
dc.titleRevisiting sequential attributable fractions.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publiqueen_US
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
dc.source.volume78
dc.source.beginpage67
dc.source.endpage
refterms.dateFOA2021-07-09T16:02:39Z
dc.source.countryEngland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s13690-020-00442-x.pdf
Size:
1.482Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record