Frameworks for self-management support for chronic disease: a cross-country comparative document analysis.
AffiliationSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork
Local subject classificationHEALTH POLICY
MetadataShow full item record
CitationFrameworks for self-management support for chronic disease: a cross-country comparative document analysis. 2018, 18 (1):583 BMC Health Serv Res
PublisherBMC health services research
JournalBMC health services research
AbstractIn a number of countries, frameworks have been developed to improve self-management support (SMS) in order to reduce the impact of chronic disease. The frameworks potentially provide direction for system-wide change in the provision of SMS by healthcare systems. Although policy formulation sets a foundation for health service reform, little is currently known about the processes which underpin SMS framework development as well as the respective implementation and evaluation plans.
The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-country comparative document analysis of frameworks on SMS for chronic diseases in member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. SMS frameworks were sourced through a systematic grey literature search and compared through document analysis using the Health Policy Triangle framework focusing on policy context, contents, actors involved and processes of development, implementation and evaluation.
Eight framework documents published from 2008 to 2017 were included for analysis from: Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Manitoba, Queensland, Western Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory. The number of chronic diseases identified for SMS varied across the frameworks. A notable gap was a lack of focus on multimorbidity. Common courses of action across countries included the provision of self-management programmes for individuals with chronic disease and education to health professionals, though different approaches were proposed. The 'actors' involved in policy formulation were inconsistent across countries and it was only clear from two frameworks that individuals with chronic disease were directly involved. Half of the frameworks had SMS implementation plans with timelines. Although all frameworks referred to the need for evaluation of SMS implementation, few provided a detailed plan.
Differences across frameworks may have implications for their success including: the extent to which people with chronic disease are involved in policy making; the courses of action taken to enhance SMS; and planned implementation processes including governance and infrastructure. Further research is needed to examine how differences in frameworks have affected implementation and to identify the critical success factors in SMS policy implementation.
- Toward consensus on self-management support: the international chronic condition self-management support framework.
- Authors: Mills SL, Brady TJ, Jayanthan J, Ziabakhsh S, Sargious PM
- Issue date: 2017 Dec 1
- Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries.
- Authors: Rogers A, Vassilev I, Pumar MJ, Todorova E, Portillo MC, Foss C, Koetsenruijter J, Ratsika N, Serrano M, Knutsen IA, Wensing M, Roukova P, Patelarou E, Kennedy A, Lionis C
- Issue date: 2015 Jul 8
- A comparative analysis of policies addressing rural oral health in eight English-speaking OECD countries.
- Authors: Crocombe LA, Goldberg LR, Bell E, Seidel B
- Issue date: 2017 Jul-Sep
- Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients.
- Authors: Kennedy A, Rogers A, Chew-Graham C, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Gardner C, Lee V, Morris R, Protheroe J
- Issue date: 2014 Oct 21
- Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care models of service delivery: a scoping review protocol.
- Authors: Harfield S, Davy C, Kite E, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown N, Brown A
- Issue date: 2015 Nov