Factors affecting length of stay in forensic hospital setting: need for therapeutic security and course of admission
dc.contributor.author | Davoren, Mary | |
dc.contributor.author | Byrne, Orla | |
dc.contributor.author | O’Connell, Paul | |
dc.contributor.author | O’Neill, Helen | |
dc.contributor.author | O’Reilly, Ken | |
dc.contributor.author | Kennedy, Harry G | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-27T12:31:00Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-11-27T12:31:00Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2015-11-23 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 23;15(1):301 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0686-4 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10147/582801 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Patients admitted to a secure forensic hospital are at risk of a long hospital stay. Forensic hospital beds are a scarce and expensive resource and ability to identify the factors predicting length of stay at time of admission would be beneficial. The DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale are designed to assess need for therapeutic security and urgency of that need while the HCR-20 predicts risk of violence. We hypothesized that items on the DUNDRUM-1 and DUNDRUM-2 scales, rated at the time of pre-admission assessment, would predict length of stay in a medium secure forensic hospital setting. Methods This is a prospective study. All admissions to a medium secure forensic hospital setting were collated over a 54 month period (n = 279) and followed up for a total of 66 months. Each patient was rated using the DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale as part of a pre-admission assessment (n = 279) and HCR-20 within 2 weeks of admission (n = 187). Episodes of harm to self, harm to others and episodes of seclusion whilst an in-patient were collated. Date of discharge was noted for each individual. Results Diagnosis at the time of pre-admission assessment (adjustment disorder v other diagnosis), predicted legal status (sentenced v mental health order) and items on the DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and the DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale, also rated at the time of pre-admission assessment, predicted length of stay in the forensic hospital setting. Need for seclusion following admission also predicted length of stay. Conclusions These findings may form the basis for a structured professional judgment instrument, rated prior to or at time of admission, to assist in estimating length of stay for forensic patients. Such a tool would be useful to clinicians, service planners and commissioners given the high cost of secure psychiatric care. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH | en |
dc.subject | ACUTE CARE | en |
dc.subject | HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS | en |
dc.subject | ASSESSMENT SCALES | en |
dc.title | Factors affecting length of stay in forensic hospital setting: need for therapeutic security and course of admission | en |
dc.language.rfc3066 | en | en |
dc.rights.holder | Davoren et al. | en |
dc.date.updated | 2015-11-23T17:02:30Z | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-30T14:44:25Z | |
html.description.abstract | Abstract Background Patients admitted to a secure forensic hospital are at risk of a long hospital stay. Forensic hospital beds are a scarce and expensive resource and ability to identify the factors predicting length of stay at time of admission would be beneficial. The DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale are designed to assess need for therapeutic security and urgency of that need while the HCR-20 predicts risk of violence. We hypothesized that items on the DUNDRUM-1 and DUNDRUM-2 scales, rated at the time of pre-admission assessment, would predict length of stay in a medium secure forensic hospital setting. Methods This is a prospective study. All admissions to a medium secure forensic hospital setting were collated over a 54 month period (n = 279) and followed up for a total of 66 months. Each patient was rated using the DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale as part of a pre-admission assessment (n = 279) and HCR-20 within 2 weeks of admission (n = 187). Episodes of harm to self, harm to others and episodes of seclusion whilst an in-patient were collated. Date of discharge was noted for each individual. Results Diagnosis at the time of pre-admission assessment (adjustment disorder v other diagnosis), predicted legal status (sentenced v mental health order) and items on the DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and the DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale, also rated at the time of pre-admission assessment, predicted length of stay in the forensic hospital setting. Need for seclusion following admission also predicted length of stay. Conclusions These findings may form the basis for a structured professional judgment instrument, rated prior to or at time of admission, to assist in estimating length of stay for forensic patients. Such a tool would be useful to clinicians, service planners and commissioners given the high cost of secure psychiatric care. |