Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance.
Review Literature as Topic
MetadataShow full item record
CitationImproving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance. 2014, 4 (10):e005834 BMJ Open
AbstractTargeted messaging, educational visits and summaries are recommended to enhance systematic review uptake. Identified promising approaches need to be developed further. New strategies are required to encompass neglected barriers and facilitators. This review addressed effectiveness and also appropriateness of knowledge uptake strategies.
DescriptionOBJECTIVE: Little is known about the barriers, facilitators and interventions that impact on systematic review uptake. The objective of this study was to identify how uptake of systematic reviews can be improved. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they addressed interventions enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews. Reports in any language were included. All decisionmakers were eligible. Studies could be randomised trials, cluster-randomised trials, controlled-clinical trials and before-and-after studies. DATA SOURCES: We searched 19 databases including PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library, covering the full range of publication years from inception to December 2010. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality according to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria. RESULTS: 10 studies from 11 countries, containing 12 interventions met our criteria. Settings included a hospital, a government department and a medical school. Doctors, nurses, mid-wives, patients and programme managers were targeted. Six of the studies were geared to improving knowledge and attitudes while four targeted clinical practice. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Three studies of low-to-moderate risk of bias, identified interventions that showed a statistically significant improvement: educational visits, short summaries of systematic reviews and targeted messaging. Promising interventions include e-learning, computer-based learning, inactive workshops, use of knowledge brokers and an e-registry of reviews. Juxtaposing barriers and facilitators alongside the identified interventions, it was clear that the three effective approaches addressed a wide range of barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: A limited number of studies were found for inclusion. However, the extensive literature search is one of the strengths of this review. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted messaging, educational visits and summaries are recommended to enhance systematic review uptake. Identified promising approaches need to be developed further. New strategies are required to encompass neglected barriers and facilitators. This review addressed effectiveness and also appropriateness of knowledge uptake strategies.
- Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.
- Authors: Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, Roberts NW, Straus SE
- Issue date: 2012 Sep 12
- Making evidence more wanted: a systematic review of facilitators to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
- Authors: Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M
- Issue date: 2012 Dec
- Public stewardship of private for-profit healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries.
- Authors: Wiysonge CS, Abdullahi LH, Ndze VN, Hussey GD
- Issue date: 2016 Aug 11
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.
- Authors: Ryan R, Santesso N, Lowe D, Hill S, Grimshaw J, Prictor M, Kaufman C, Cowie G, Taylor M
- Issue date: 2014 Apr 29
- Integrating prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes with other health services for preventing HIV infection and improving HIV outcomes in developing countries.
- Authors: Tudor Car L, van-Velthoven MH, Brusamento S, Elmoniry H, Car J, Majeed A, Atun R
- Issue date: 2011 Jun 15