• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Other Irish Health Organisations
    • Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Other Irish Health Organisations
    • Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Map of Submissions

    Home Page
    UlsterN
    4995
    UlsterS
    4995
    Connacht
    1672
    Munster
    54
    Leinster
    456

    Browse

    All of Lenus, The Irish Health RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsDate publishedSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsDate publishedSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About LenusDirectory of Open Access JournalsOpen Access Publishing GuideNational Health Library & Knowledge ServiceGuide to Publishers' PoliciesFAQsTerms and ConditionsVision StatementORCID Unique identifiers for ResearchersHSE position statement on Open AccessNational Open Research Forum (NORF)Zenodo (European Open Research repository)

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A concept in flux: questioning accountability in the context of global health cooperation

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    s12992-014-0073-9.xml
    Size:
    137.0Kb
    Format:
    XML
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    s12992-014-0073-9.pdf
    Size:
    614.3Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    View more filesView fewer files
    Authors
    Bruen, Carlos
    Brugha, Ruairí
    Kageni, Angela
    Wafula, Francis
    Issue Date
    2014-12-09
    Keywords
    GLOBAL HEALTH
    ACCOUNTABILITY
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Globalization and Health. 2014 Dec 09;10(1):73
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-014-0073-9
    http://hdl.handle.net/10147/559494
    Abstract
    Abstract Background Accountability in global health is a commonly invoked though less commonly questioned concept. Critically reflecting on the concept and how it is put into practice, this paper focuses on the who, what, how, and where of accountability, mapping its defining features and considering them with respect to real-world circumstances. Changing dynamics in global health cooperation - such as the emergence of new health public-private partnerships and the formal inclusion of non-state actors in policy making processes - provides the backdrop to this discussion. Discussion Accountability is frequently reduced to one set of actors holding another to account. Changes in the global health landscape and in relations between actors have however made the practice of accountability more complex and contested. Currently undergoing a reframing process, participation and transparency have become core elements of a new accountability agenda alongside evaluation and redress or enforcement mechanisms. However, while accountability is about holding actors responsible for their actions, the mechanisms through which this might be done vary substantially and are far from politically neutral. Accountability in global health cooperation involves multipolar relationships between a large number of stakeholders with varying degrees of power and influence, where not all interests are realised in that relationship. Moreover, accountability differs across finance, programme and governance subfields, where each has its own set of policy processes, institutional structures, accountability relations and power asymmetries to contend with. With reference to the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, this paper contributes to discussions on accountability by mapping out key elements of the concept and how it is put into practice, where different types of accountability battle for recognition and legitimacy. Summary In mapping some defining features, accountability in global health cooperation is shown to be a complex problem not necessarily reducible to one set of actors holding another to account. Clear tensions are observed between multi-stakeholder participatory models and more traditional vertical models that prioritise accountability upwards to donors, both of which are embodied in initiatives like the Global Fund. For multi-constituency organisations, this poses challenges not only for future financing but also for future legitimacy.
    Language
    en
    Collections
    Publications

    entitlement

     
    Health Library Ireland | Health Service Executive | Jervis House, Jervis Street | Republic of Ireland | Eircode: D01 W596
    lenus@hse.ie | Tel: +353-1-7786275
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Disclaimer
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.