A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
AffiliationDepartment of Surgery, Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland. firstname.lastname@example.org
MeSHClinical Trials as Topic
MetadataShow full item record
CitationA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. 2013, 15 (3):269-77 Colorectal Dis
JournalColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
AbstractEvidence supporting the role of laparoscopy in abdominoperineal resection (APR) is limited. This study compared the short-term and long-term outcomes and complications associated with open and laparoscopic APR.
- Evaluation of short-term outcomes after laparoscopically assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
- Authors: Wang Z, Zhang XM, Liang JW, Hu JJ, Zeng WG, Zhou ZX
- Issue date: 2014 Nov
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
- Authors: Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG
- Issue date: 2006 Mar
- Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Regarding Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Authors: Jiang JB, Jiang K, Wang JJ, Dai Y, Xie FB, Li XM
- Issue date: 2015 Aug
- Case-matched comparison of the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
- Authors: Inada R, Yamamoto S, Oshiro T, Takawa M, Fujita S, Akasu T
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
- Authors: Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gullà N, Noya G, Boselli C
- Issue date: 2012 Apr