• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Irish Health Organisations
    • Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Irish Health Organisations
    • Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Map of Submissions

    Home Page
    UlsterN
    4963
    UlsterS
    4963
    Connacht
    1639
    Munster
    58
    Leinster
    457

    Browse

    All of Lenus, The Irish Health RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsDate publishedSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsDate publishedSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About LenusDirectory of Open Access JournalsOpen Access Publishing GuideNational Health Library & Knowledge ServiceGuide to Publishers' PoliciesFAQsTerms and ConditionsVision StatementORCID Unique identifiers for ResearchersHSE position statement on Open AccessNational Open Research Forum (NORF)Zenodo (European Open Research repository)

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Surgeons' experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    1748-5908-9-84.xml
    Size:
    107.3Kb
    Format:
    XML
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    1748-5908-9-84.pdf
    Size:
    456.7Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    1748-5908-9-84-S1.docx
    Size:
    27.31Kb
    Format:
    Microsoft Word 2007
    DownloadPDF Variant
    View more filesView fewer files
    Authors
    Boyce, Maria B
    Browne, John P
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    Issue Date
    2014-06-27
    Keywords
    SURGERY
    PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT
    Local subject classification
    SURGERY, ORTHOPAEDIC
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Boyce MB, Browne JB, Greenhalgh J.Surgeons' experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study. Implementation Science. 2014 Jun 27;9(1):84
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-84
    http://hdl.handle.net/10147/324304
    Abstract
    Abstract Background The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide healthcare professionals with peer benchmarked feedback is growing. However, there is little evidence on the opinions of professionals on the value of this information in practice. The purpose of this research is to explore surgeon’s experiences of receiving peer benchmarked PROMs feedback and to examine whether this information led to changes in their practice. Methods This qualitative research employed a Framework approach. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with surgeons who received peer benchmarked PROMs feedback. The participants included eleven consultant orthopaedic surgeons in the Republic of Ireland. Results Five themes were identified: conceptual, methodological, practical, attitudinal, and impact. A typology was developed based on the attitudinal and impact themes from which three distinct groups emerged. ‘Advocates’ had positive attitudes towards PROMs and confirmed that the information promoted a self-reflective process. ‘Converts’ were uncertain about the value of PROMs, which reduced their inclination to use the data. ‘Sceptics’ had negative attitudes towards PROMs and claimed that the information had no impact on their behaviour. The conceptual, methodological and practical factors were linked to the typology. Conclusion Surgeons had mixed opinions on the value of peer benchmarked PROMs data. Many appreciated the feedback as it reassured them that their practice was similar to their peers. However, PROMs information alone was considered insufficient to help identify opportunities for quality improvements. The reasons for the observed reluctance of participants to embrace PROMs can be categorised into conceptual, methodological, and practical factors. Policy makers and researchers need to increase professionals’ awareness of the numerous purposes and benefits of using PROMs, challenge the current methods to measure performance using PROMs, and reduce the burden of data collection and information dissemination on routine practice.
    Item Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Collections
    Publications

    entitlement

     
    Health Library Ireland | Health Service Executive | Jervis House, Jervis Street | Republic of Ireland | Eircode: D01 W596
    lenus@hse.ie | Tel: +353-1-7786275
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Disclaimer
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.