Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGolabek, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorKiely, Eamonn
dc.contributor.authorO'Reilly, Barry
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-22T13:53:21Z
dc.date.available2013-07-22T13:53:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-22
dc.identifier.citationDetrusor overactivity in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: is there a difference?, 38 (5):652-9; discussion 660 Int Braz J Urolen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1677-6119
dc.identifier.pmid23131522
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/296811
dc.description.abstractTo compare urodynamic characteristics in patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) with those of an age matched cohort with diabetes mellitus (DM) and detrusor overactivity (DO). Secondly, to determine whether urodynamic features could help distinguish these two groups of patients.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urologyen_GB
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAge Factors
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subject.meshEpidemiologic Methods
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHemoglobin A, Glycosylated
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshReference Values
dc.subject.meshUrinary Bladder, Overactive
dc.subject.meshUrinary Incontinence
dc.subject.meshUrodynamics
dc.titleDetrusor overactivity in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: is there a difference?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentCork University Hospital, Cork, Republic of Ireland. elementare@op.plen_GB
dc.identifier.journalInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urologyen_GB
dc.description.fundingNo fundingen
dc.description.provinceMunsteren
dc.description.peer-reviewpeer-reviewen
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-23T06:26:43Z
html.description.abstractTo compare urodynamic characteristics in patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) with those of an age matched cohort with diabetes mellitus (DM) and detrusor overactivity (DO). Secondly, to determine whether urodynamic features could help distinguish these two groups of patients.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Golabek652660.pdf
Size:
125.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record