An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical FOBT colorectal cancer screening programme.
dc.contributor.author | Kelley, Leanne | |
dc.contributor.author | Swan, Niall | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, David J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-22T13:10:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-22T13:10:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-06-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical FOBT colorectal cancer screening programme. 2013: Colorectal Dis | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1463-1318 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23746062 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/codi.12310 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10147/296785 | |
dc.description.abstract | AIM: This study examined the relevance of using a two sample quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT or FIT) at a high cut off stringency by the first population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) pilot screening programme in Ireland. METHOD: Approximately ten thousand individuals between the ages of 50-74 years were invited to perform two consecutive FITs. These were analysed in tandem using the OC-Sensor and participants with at least one positive result with a haemoglobin cut off for positivity at 100 ng/ml were offered colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 5023 (52%) (2177 (43%) male; 2846 (57%) female) individuals with a median age of 64 years participated. At least one positive FIT test was detected from 514 (10%) individuals. From the 419 (82%) patients who proceeded to colonoscopy 17 (4%) had CRC and 132(33%) had an advanced adenoma. The detection rate for these screen relevant lesions was 3% (95% CIs = 2.5% - 3.5%) and the FIT positive + colonoscopy detection rate was 36% (95% CI = 31% - 40%). The numbers needed to colonoscope to find an advanced lesion was 2.8. The two test system detected four (23.5%) additional patients with CRC and 37 (28%) with an advanced adenoma compared with a single test. CONCLUSION: The CRC miss rate estimated for a single test (23.5%) was unacceptably high when the goal was to maximize the discovery of advanced lesions in the initial screening round. We conclude that the two test protocol at a high cut off threshold is suitable to optimize FIT screening in Ireland. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. | |
dc.language | ENG | |
dc.rights | Archived with thanks to Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland | en_GB |
dc.title | An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical FOBT colorectal cancer screening programme. | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Gastroenterology, Adelaide & Meath Hospital, Dublin, 24, Ireland. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland | en_GB |
dc.description.funding | No funding | en |
dc.description.province | Leinster | en |
dc.description.peer-review | peer-review | en |
html.description.abstract | AIM: This study examined the relevance of using a two sample quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT or FIT) at a high cut off stringency by the first population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) pilot screening programme in Ireland. METHOD: Approximately ten thousand individuals between the ages of 50-74 years were invited to perform two consecutive FITs. These were analysed in tandem using the OC-Sensor and participants with at least one positive result with a haemoglobin cut off for positivity at 100 ng/ml were offered colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 5023 (52%) (2177 (43%) male; 2846 (57%) female) individuals with a median age of 64 years participated. At least one positive FIT test was detected from 514 (10%) individuals. From the 419 (82%) patients who proceeded to colonoscopy 17 (4%) had CRC and 132(33%) had an advanced adenoma. The detection rate for these screen relevant lesions was 3% (95% CIs = 2.5% - 3.5%) and the FIT positive + colonoscopy detection rate was 36% (95% CI = 31% - 40%). The numbers needed to colonoscope to find an advanced lesion was 2.8. The two test system detected four (23.5%) additional patients with CRC and 37 (28%) with an advanced adenoma compared with a single test. CONCLUSION: The CRC miss rate estimated for a single test (23.5%) was unacceptably high when the goal was to maximize the discovery of advanced lesions in the initial screening round. We conclude that the two test protocol at a high cut off threshold is suitable to optimize FIT screening in Ireland. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |