• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Hospital Research
    • Leinster
    • Dublin Dental University Hospital
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Hospital Research
    • Leinster
    • Dublin Dental University Hospital
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Map of Submissions

    Home Page
    UlsterN
    4378
    UlsterS
    4378
    Connacht
    1408
    Munster
    62
    Leinster
    426

    Browse

    All of Lenus, The Irish Health RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsDate publishedSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsDate publishedSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    About LenusDirectory of Open Access JournalsOpen Access Publishing GuideHSE Library Guide to Publishers' PoliciesFAQsTerms and ConditionsVision StatementORCID Unique identifiers for ResearchersHSE position statement on Open AccessNational Open Research Forum (NORF)Zenodo (European Open Research repository)

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: outdated and inaccurate?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Publisher version
    View Source
    Access full-text PDFOpen Access
    View Source
    Check access options
    Check access options
    Authors
    Macauley, Donal
    Garvey, Thérèse M
    Dowling, Adam H
    Fleming, Garry J P
    Affiliation
    Orthodontics Unit, Division of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
    Issue Date
    2012-12
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: outdated and inaccurate? 2012, 40 (12):1127-33 J Dent
    Journal
    Journal of dentistry
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10147/291058
    DOI
    10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.010
    PubMed ID
    23000526
    Abstract
    Little's Irregularity Index (LII) was devised to objectively score mandibular incisor alignment for epidemiological studies but has been extended to assess the relative performance of orthodontic brackets, retainer or treatment modalities. Our aim was to examine the repeatability and precision of LII measurements of four independent examiners on the maxillary arch of orthodontic patients. The hypothesis was that the reproducibility of individual contact point displacement measurements, used to calculate the LII score, are inappropriate.
    Item Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1879-176X
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.010
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Dublin Dental University Hospital

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
    • Authors: Burns A, Dowling AH, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ
    • Issue date: 2014 Oct
    • Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    • Authors: Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ
    • Issue date: 2013 Dec
    • Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
    • Authors: Ma W, Preston B, Asai Y, Guan H, Guan G
    • Issue date: 2014 Nov
    • Little's irregularity index: photographic assessment vs study model assessment.
    • Authors: Almasoud N, Bearn D
    • Issue date: 2010 Dec
    • Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial.
    • Authors: Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E
    • Issue date: 2015 Aug
    HSE Library | Health Service Executive | Dr Steevens’ Hospital, Dublin 8 | Republic of Ireland | Eircode: D08 W2A8
    lenus@hse.ie
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Disclaimer
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.