Reliability of the CMT neuropathy score (second version) in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
Authors
Murphy, Sinéad MHerrmann, David N
McDermott, Michael P
Scherer, Steven S
Shy, Michael E
Reilly, Mary M
Pareyson, Davide
Affiliation
MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. sinead.murphy@uclh.nhs.ukIssue Date
2011-09MeSH
AdultCharcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurologic Examination
Observer Variation
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Young Adult
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Reliability of the CMT neuropathy score (second version) in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. 2011, 16 (3):191-8 J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst.Journal
Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNSDOI
10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00350.xPubMed ID
22003934Abstract
The Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy score (CMTNS) is a reliable and valid composite score comprising symptoms, signs, and neurophysiological tests, which has been used in natural history studies of CMT1A and CMT1X and as an outcome measure in treatment trials of CMT1A. Following an international workshop on outcome measures in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), the CMTNS was modified to attempt to reduce floor and ceiling effects and to standardize patient assessment, aiming to improve its sensitivity for detecting change over time and the effect of an intervention. After agreeing on the modifications made to the CMTNS (CMTNS2), three examiners evaluated 16 patients to determine inter-rater reliability; one examiner evaluated 18 patients twice within 8 weeks to determine intra-rater reliability. Three examiners evaluated 63 patients using the CMTNS and the CMTNS2 to determine how the modifications altered scoring. For inter- and intra-rater reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.96 for the CMT symptom score and the CMT examination score. There were small but significant differences in some of the individual components of the CMTNS compared with the CMTNS2, mainly in the components that had been modified the most. A longitudinal study is in progress to determine whether the CMTNS2 is more sensitive than the CMTNS for detecting change over time.Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1529-8027ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00350.x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Neuropathy progression in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A.
- Authors: Shy ME, Chen L, Swan ER, Taube R, Krajewski KM, Herrmann D, Lewis RA, McDermott MP
- Issue date: 2008 Jan 29
- Reliability and validity of the CMT neuropathy score as a measure of disability.
- Authors: Shy ME, Blake J, Krajewski K, Fuerst DR, Laura M, Hahn AF, Li J, Lewis RA, Reilly M
- Issue date: 2005 Apr 12
- [The application of scales and characteristics of disability in the common genotypes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease].
- Authors: Liu X, Zhang RX, Liu L, Xie YZ, Lin ZQ, Zhao Q, Cao WQ, Zhu XY, Li XB
- Issue date: 2021 Jan 12
- Selected items from the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Neuropathy Score and secondary clinical outcome measures serve as sensitive clinical markers of disease severity in CMT1A patients.
- Authors: Mannil M, Solari A, Leha A, Pelayo-Negro AL, Berciano J, Schlotter-Weigel B, Walter MC, Rautenstrauss B, Schnizer TJ, Schenone A, Seeman P, Kadian C, Schreiber O, Angarita NG, Fabrizi GM, Gemignani F, Padua L, Santoro L, Quattrone A, Vita G, Calabrese D, CMT-TRIAAL/CMT-TRAUK Group, Young P, Laurà M, Haberlová J, Mazanec R, Paulus W, Beissbarth T, Shy ME, Reilly MM, Pareyson D, Sereda MW
- Issue date: 2014 Nov
- Reliability of clinical outcome measures in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
- Authors: Solari A, Laurà M, Salsano E, Radice D, Pareyson D, CMT-TRIAAL Study Group
- Issue date: 2008 Jan