Complex rectal polyps: other treatment modalities required when offering a transanal endoscopic microsurgery service.
Authors
Joyce, Myles REguare, Emmanuel
Kiernan, Fiona
Swan, Niall
Crotty, Paul
Neary, Paul
Keane, Frank B V
Affiliation
Division of Colorectal Surgery, The Adelaide & Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. mylesjoyce@eircom.netIssue Date
2011-09MeSH
AdultAged
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal
Combined Modality Therapy
Demography
Female
Humans
Male
Microsurgery
Middle Aged
Patient Positioning
Polyps
Postoperative Complications
Proctoscopy
Rectal Diseases
Referral and Consultation
Young Adult
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Complex rectal polyps: other treatment modalities required when offering a transanal endoscopic microsurgery service. 2011, 26 (9):1177-82 Int J Colorectal DisJournal
International journal of colorectal diseaseDOI
10.1007/s00384-011-1212-xPubMed ID
21553009Abstract
Complex rectal polyps may present a clinical challenge. The study aim was to assess different treatment modalities required in the management of patients referred for transanal endoscopic microsurgery.Patients referred with complex rectal polyps from 1998 to 2008 were entered prospectively to a colorectal database. These data was analyzed for referral pattern, histology, surgical procedures performed, and subsequent outcome.
Of the 209 patients referred (101 female, 108 male, median age of 65 years, range of 24-89), 132 (63%) were deemed suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Seventeen patients required a second staged procedure; three patients required an anterior resection at time of index surgery. Seventeen patients referred for transanal endoscopic microsurgery went direct to anterior resection, 37 underwent snare polypectomy (SP), and 17 patients underwent transanal excision. Six patients had no surgery (three unfit for anesthesia and three had no residual lesions). Thus, 37% of the patients referred for transanal endoscopic microsurgery required a different treatment modality.
Majority of patients referred to our unit with complex rectal polyps were suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. However, this study highlights that in offering a transanal microsurgery service, one should be prepared for a diversity of pathology necessitating a range of management options.
Language
enISSN
1432-1262Ethical Approval
N/Aae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00384-011-1212-x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution.
- Authors: Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB, São Julião GP, Bianchi R, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery are rare and minor: a single institution's analysis and comparison to existing data.
- Authors: Kumar AS, Coralic J, Kelleher DC, Sidani S, Kolli K, Smith LE
- Issue date: 2013 Mar
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic resection of malignant rectal polyps: a useful technique for indication to radical treatment.
- Authors: Arolfo S, Allaix ME, Migliore M, Cravero F, Arezzo A, Morino M
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- [Local excision with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after endoscopic R1/R2-polypectomy of pT1 "low-risk" carcinomas of the rectum].
- Authors: Schäfer HH, Vivaldi C, Hölscher AH
- Issue date: 2006 Aug
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective evaluation of functional results.
- Authors: Cataldo PA, O'Brien S, Osler T
- Issue date: 2005 Jul