Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReardon, C M
dc.contributor.authorKavanagh, E G
dc.contributor.authorSabah, M
dc.contributor.authorKirwan, W O
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-03T15:14:17Z
dc.date.available2012-02-03T15:14:17Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-03T15:14:17Z
dc.identifier.citationDis Colon Rectum. 1998 Oct;41(10):1312-4; discussion 1314-5.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0012-3706 (Print)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0012-3706 (Linking)en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid9788396en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/209176
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The aim of this article is to emphasize the increased risk of developing metachronous ovarian tumors after resection of rectal cancer. METHOD AND RESULTS: We report the case of a postmenopausal female patient who, five years after anterior resection, developed a primary ovarian malignancy that invaded a rectal anastomosis and in so doing mimicked a recurrence of a Dukes A rectal cancer. To our knowledge, such an occurrence has not been described previously in the literature. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the possible benefits of routine prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of colorectal cancer resection.
dc.language.isoengen_GB
dc.subject.meshAdenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/*surgeryen_GB
dc.subject.meshAgeden_GB
dc.subject.meshColorectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/*surgeryen_GB
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_GB
dc.subject.meshHumansen_GB
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/*diagnosisen_GB
dc.subject.meshNeoplasms, Second Primary/*diagnosis/pathologyen_GB
dc.subject.meshOvarian Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/prevention & controlen_GB
dc.subject.meshOvariectomyen_GB
dc.titleOvarian cancer mimicking recurrence at colorectal anastomosis: report of a case.en_GB
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork City, Ireland.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalDiseases of the colon and rectumen_GB
dc.description.provinceMunster
html.description.abstractPURPOSE: The aim of this article is to emphasize the increased risk of developing metachronous ovarian tumors after resection of rectal cancer. METHOD AND RESULTS: We report the case of a postmenopausal female patient who, five years after anterior resection, developed a primary ovarian malignancy that invaded a rectal anastomosis and in so doing mimicked a recurrence of a Dukes A rectal cancer. To our knowledge, such an occurrence has not been described previously in the literature. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the possible benefits of routine prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of colorectal cancer resection.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record