AffiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medicine, Cork University , Hospital, Cork.
Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control
MetadataShow full item record
CitationIr J Med Sci. 2000 Jul-Sep;169(3):211-4.
JournalIrish journal of medical science
AbstractBACKGROUND: Anaesthetists are at high risk from blood-borne pathogens. Universal Precautions (UP) include the routine use of appropriate barrier precautions and techniques to reduce the likelihood of exposure to blood, body fluids and tissues that may contain pathogens. The compliance of Irish anaesthetists with these precautions has not been studied. AIM: To study the attitudes of Irish anaesthetists to Universal Precautions. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to 210 anaesthetists currently practising in Ireland. The questionnaire was based on a model used in Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: There was a 50% response rate to the survey. Only 15% of respondents had taken a risk history from a patient in the preceding four weeks. Resheathing of needles was commonplace. The effectiveness of hepatitis B immunisation was rarely checked and only 66% of respondents believe implementation of Universal Precautions to be practical. CONCLUSION: Irish anaesthetists comply poorly with Universal Precautions.
- Universal precautions: attitudes of Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists.
- Authors: Richards MJ, Jenkin GA, Johnson PD
- Issue date: 1997 Feb 3
- Practice of universal precautions among healthcare workers.
- Authors: Sadoh WE, Fawole AO, Sadoh AE, Oladimeji AO, Sotiloye OS
- Issue date: 2006 May
- Universal precautions: a survey of community nurses' experience and practice.
- Authors: Bennett G, Mansell I
- Issue date: 2004 May
- Noncompliance with universal precautions and the associated risk of mucocutaneous blood exposure among Danish physicians.
- Authors: Nelsing S, Nielsen TL, Nielsen JO
- Issue date: 1997 Oct