Nasogastric intubation causes gastroesophageal reflux in patients undergoing elective laparotomy.
AffiliationDepartment of Surgery, University College Cork, and Cork University Hospital,, Cork, Ireland.
Intubation, Gastrointestinal/*adverse effects
MetadataShow full item record
CitationSurgery. 2001 Nov;130(5):788-91.
AbstractBACKGROUND: The routine use of nasogastric tubes in patients undergoing elective abdominal operation is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative fever, atelectasis, and pneumonia. Previous studies have shown that nasogastric tubes have no significant effect on the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux or on lower esophageal sphincter pressure in healthy volunteers. We hypothesized that nasogastric intubation in patients undergoing laparotomy reduces lower esophageal sphincter pressure and promotes gastroesophageal reflux in the perioperative period. METHODS: A prospective randomized case-control study was undertaken in which 15 consenting patients, admitted electively for bowel surgery, were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 underwent nasogastric intubation after induction of anesthesia, and Group 2 did not. All patients had manometry and pH probes placed with the aid of endoscopic vision at the lower esophageal sphincter and distal esophagus, respectively. Nasogastric tubes, where present, were left on free drainage, and sphincter pressures and pH were recorded continuously during a 24-hour period. Data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean number of reflux episodes (defined as pH < 4) in the nasogastric tube group was 137 compared with a median of 8 episodes in the group managed without nasogastric tubes (P =.006). The median duration of the longest episode of reflux was 132 minutes in Group 1 and 1 minute in Group 2 (P =.001). A mean of 13.3 episodes of reflux lasted longer than 5 minutes in Group 1, with pH less than 4 for 37.4% of the 24 hours. This was in contrast to Group 2 where a mean of 0.13 episodes lasted longer than 5 minutes (P =.001) and pH less than 4 for 0.2% of total time (P =.001). The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressures were lower in Group 1. CONCLUSIONS. These findings demonstrate that patients undergoing elective laparotomy with routine nasogastric tube placement have significant gastroesophageal reflux in the perioperative period and a reduced ability to clear refluxed acid from the distal esophagus. Due to the associated risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, we recommend that nasogastric intubation be performed on a selective rather than routine basis.
- The effect of nasogastric intubation on gastroesophageal reflux: a comparison of different tube sizes.
- Authors: Kuo B, Castell DO
- Issue date: 1995 Oct
- Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
- Authors: López-Alonso M, Moya MJ, Cabo JA, Ribas J, del Carmen Macías M, Silny J, Sifrim D
- Issue date: 2006 Aug
- Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.
- Authors: Decktor DL, Krawet SH, Rodriguez SL, Robinson M, Castell DO
- Issue date: 1996 Jun
- Effect of naproxen on gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
- Authors: Scheiman JM, Patel PM, Henson EK, Nostrant TT
- Issue date: 1995 May
- [Effect of proximal gastric vagotomy on the competence of the lower sphincter of the esophagus].
- Authors: Ottignon Y, Pelissier E, Blum D, Deschamps JP, Bachour A, Girard JF, Carayon P
- Issue date: 1989 Mar