Antiseptic wick: does it reduce the incidence of wound infection following appendectomy?
Authors
McGreal, Gerald TJoy, Aislinn
Manning, Brian
Kelly, John L
O'Donnell, Joseph A
Kirwan, W William O
Redmond, H Paul
Affiliation
Department of Surgery, Professorial Unit, Cork University Hospital, Cork,, Ireland.Issue Date
2012-02-03T15:10:30ZMeSH
AdolescentAdult
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/*therapeutic use
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Appendectomy/*methods
Appendicitis/*surgery
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Period
Povidone-Iodine/*therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgical Wound Infection/*prevention & control
*Suture Techniques
Treatment Outcome
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
World J Surg. 2002 May;26(5):631-4. Epub 2002 Mar 18.Journal
World journal of surgeryDOI
10.1007/s00268-001-0281-3PubMed ID
12098059Abstract
The role of prophylactic antibiotics is well established for contaminated wounds, but the use of antiseptic wound wicks is controversial. The aim of this work was to study the potential use of wound wicks to reduce the rate of infection following appendectomy. This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at a university hospital in the department of surgery. The subjects were patients undergoing appendectomy for definite acute appendicitis. They were randomized by computer to primary subcuticular wound closure or use of an antiseptic wound wick. For the latter, ribbon gauze soaked in povidone-iodine was placed between interrupted nylon skin sutures. Wicks were soaked daily and removed on the fourth postoperative day. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. They were reviewed while in hospital and 4 weeks following operation for evidence of wound infection. The main outcome measures were wound infection, wound discomfort, and cosmetic result. The overall wound infection rate was 8.6% (15/174). In patients with wound wicks it was 11.6% (10/86) compared to 5.6% (5/88) in those whose wounds were closed by subcuticular sutures (p = NS). We concluded that the use of wound wicks was not associated with decreased wound infection rates following appendectomy. Subcuticular closure is therefore appropriate in view of its greater convenience and safety.Language
engISSN
0364-2313 (Print)0364-2313 (Linking)
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00268-001-0281-3
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Subcuticular skin closure as a standard approach to emergency appendectomy in children: prospective clinical trial.
- Authors: Serour F, Efrati Y, Klin B, Barr J, Gorenstein A, Vinograd I
- Issue date: 1996 Jan
- [Surgical Site Infections after Open Appendectomy and Effectiveness of Complex Approach to Their Prevention].
- Authors: Golub AV, Kozlov RS, Pleshkov VG, Moskalev AP, Alibegov RA, Chelombitko MA
- Issue date: 2016
- Appendectomy Skin Closure Technique, Randomized Controlled Trial: Changing Paradigms (ASC).
- Authors: Andrade LA, Muñoz FY, Báez MV, Collazos SS, de Los Angeles Martinez Ferretiz M, Ruiz B, Montes O, Woolf S, Noriega JG, Aparicio UM, Gonzalez IG
- Issue date: 2016 Nov
- Skin closure during appendicectomy: a controlled clinical trial of subcuticular and interrupted transdermal suture techniques.
- Authors: Onwuanyi ON, Evbuomwan I
- Issue date: 1990 Dec
- [Prospective study comparing the incidence of wound infection following appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children: conventional treatment versus using reabsorbable antibacterial suture or gentamicin-impregnated collagen fleeces].
- Authors: Picó RB, Jiménez LA, Sánchez MC, Castelló CH, Bilbao AM, Arias MP, Solera LS, Ramirez RV
- Issue date: 2008 Oct