Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement.
Affiliation
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, The Mews, 61, Serpentine Ave, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, Ireland. jaharty@hotmail.comIssue Date
2012-02-03T15:06:24ZMeSH
*Absorptiometry, PhotonArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/*instrumentation
*Bone Density
Femur Head/radiography
Femur Neck/radiography
*Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Procedures/*instrumentation
Osteoarthritis, Hip/radiography/surgery
Stress, Mechanical
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Dec;125(10):693-5. Epub 2005 Oct 20.Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgeryDOI
10.1007/s00402-005-0059-4PubMed ID
16237532Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Numerous reports in the literature refer to the femoral neck fracture rate in hip resurfacing. The aim of this study was to determine the bone mineral density and evidence of stress shielding around the femoral component of the Birmingham resurfacing prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with primary unilateral osteoarthritis had a Birmingham resurfacing prosthesis. DEXA analysis of the proximal femur and femoral neck was performed and compared with the opposite unaffected side. RESULTS: Total periprosthetic bone mineral density was 0.49% greater than the control, but this did not achieve statistical significance. Although the BMD of the femoral neck was slightly increased on the prosthetic side (1.002 g/cm2) as opposed to the control side, this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The Birmingham resurfacing prosthesis does not appear to reduce femoral neck bone mineral density in comparison to the normal femoral neck bone density. We conclude that femoral neck fractures are unlikely to be due to stress shielding related to the prosthesis.Language
engISSN
0936-8051 (Print)0936-8051 (Linking)
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00402-005-0059-4
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement.
- Authors: Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV
- Issue date: 2007 Dec
- Femoral neck bone mineral density after resurfacing hip arthroplasty.
- Authors: Tapaninen T, Kröger H, Jurvelin J, Venesmaa P
- Issue date: 2012
- Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
- Authors: Hjorth MH, Lorenzen ND, Søballe K, Jakobsen SS, Stilling M
- Issue date: 2017 Nov
- Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.
- Authors: Willis-Owen CA, Atkinson HD, Oakeshott RD
- Issue date: 2011 Sep
- Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study.
- Authors: Kohan L, Field C, Kerr D, Ben-Nissan B
- Issue date: 2014 Sep