Prospective study of use of perioperative antimicrobial therapy in general surgery.
AffiliationDepartment of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/*methods
Bacterial Infections/prevention & control
Cross Infection/prevention & control
Physician's Practice Patterns
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
MetadataShow full item record
CitationSurg Infect (Larchmt). 2006 Aug;7(4):355-60.
AbstractBACKGROUND: Perioperative antimicrobial therapy has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the rate of surgical site infections in clinical trials. With the emergence of antibiotic resistance, the risk of reaction, and the inevitable financial repercussions, use of prophylactic antibiotics is not a panacea, and their misuse may have considerable implications. The aim of this study was to assess the use of antibiotics in the perioperative period in both general and vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken of 131 patients with a mean age of 43 years (range one month-88 years), of whom 68 (51%) were male, who underwent twenty-seven different general or vascular surgery procedures over a four-week period. Each patient was evaluated from the time of antibiotic commencement through their operative procedure until the treatment was discontinued. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients (54%) received ten antibiotics, with 71 (97%) of these uses being prophylactic. Of the 15 appendectomies performed for uncomplicated appendicitis, the mean number of prophylactic antibiotic doses was 5.3 (range 1-12). Where they were documented, written postoperative directives were not adhered to in 18/27 prescriptions (66%). CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated a lack of adherence to guidelines in the perioperative administration of antimicrobial agents. In addition, it calls attention to the economic implications of unnecessary prophylaxis.
- [Assessment of antibiotic use and impact of an intervention intended to modify the prescribing behavior in surgical prophylaxis in 6hospitals in the metropolitan area of Monterrey, Mexico].
- Authors: Palacios-Saucedo GDC, de la Garza-Camargo M, Briones-Lara E, Carmona-González S, García-Cabello R, Islas-Esparza LA, Saldaña-Flores G, González-Cano JR, González-Ruvalcaba R, Valadez-Botello FJ, Muñoz-Maldonado GE, Montero-Cantú CA, Díaz-Ramos RD, Solórzano-Santos F
- Issue date: 2017 Nov - Dec
- Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a Turkish university hospital.
- Authors: Yalçin AN, Serin S, Gurses E, Zencir M
- Issue date: 2002 Aug
- Assessment of a protocol for prophylactic antibiotics to prevent perioperative infection in urological surgery: a preliminary study.
- Authors: Kanamaru S, Terai A, Ishitoya S, Kunishima Y, Nishiyama H, Segawa T, Nakamura E, Kinoshita H, Moroi S, Ito N, Kamoto T, Okuno H, Habuchi T, Senda K, Ichiyama S, Ogawa O, Yamamoto S
- Issue date: 2004 Jun
- Insufficient reporting of infections after ear, nose and throat surgery.
- Authors: Rasmussen S, Ovesen T
- Issue date: 2014 Jan
- [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cancer surgery].
- Authors: Vilar-Compte D, García-Pasquel MJ
- Issue date: 2011 Nov-Dec