Audit of a ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia service in Ireland.
dc.contributor.author | Tan, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Walsh, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Hu, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Power, C | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-01T10:57:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-01T10:57:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-02-01T10:57:14Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Jun;180(2):417-21. Epub 2010 Nov 23. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1863-4362 (Electronic) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-1265 (Linking) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21104335 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11845-010-0645-5 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10147/207998 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control was introduced at our institution in 2006. We audited the efficacy and safety of ward-based PCEA from January 2006 to December 2008. METHOD: Data were collected from 928 patients who received PCEA in general surgical wards for postoperative analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 mug/mL. RESULTS: On the first postoperative day, the median visual analogue pain score was 2 at rest and 4 on activity. Hypotension occurred in 21 (2.2%) patients, excessive motor blockade in 16 (1.7%), high block in 5 (0.5%), nausea in 5 (0.5%) and pruritus in only 1 patient. Excessive sedation occurred in two (0.2%) patients but no intervention was required. There were no serious complications such as epidural abscess, infection or haematoma. CONCLUSION: Effective and safe postoperative analgesia can be provided with PCEA in a general surgical ward without recourse to high-dependency supervision. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | *Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | *Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/adverse effects | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Bupivacaine/therapeutic use | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Clinical Audit | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Ireland | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain Measurement | en_GB |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain, Postoperative/*drug therapy | en_GB |
dc.title | Audit of a ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia service in Ireland. | en_GB |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Coombe Women and Infants, University Hospital, Cork Street, Dublin 8, Ireland. tutan@me.com | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Irish journal of medical science | en_GB |
dc.description.province | Leinster | |
html.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control was introduced at our institution in 2006. We audited the efficacy and safety of ward-based PCEA from January 2006 to December 2008. METHOD: Data were collected from 928 patients who received PCEA in general surgical wards for postoperative analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 mug/mL. RESULTS: On the first postoperative day, the median visual analogue pain score was 2 at rest and 4 on activity. Hypotension occurred in 21 (2.2%) patients, excessive motor blockade in 16 (1.7%), high block in 5 (0.5%), nausea in 5 (0.5%) and pruritus in only 1 patient. Excessive sedation occurred in two (0.2%) patients but no intervention was required. There were no serious complications such as epidural abscess, infection or haematoma. CONCLUSION: Effective and safe postoperative analgesia can be provided with PCEA in a general surgical ward without recourse to high-dependency supervision. |