Prevalence of renal artery stenosis in flash pulmonary oedema: determination using gadolinium-enhanced MRA.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland., colmjmcmahon@yahoo.co.ukIssue Date
2012-02-01T10:45:55ZMeSH
Acute DiseaseAged
Blood Pressure
Female
Gadolinium/diagnostic use
Humans
Hypertension, Renal/epidemiology/pathology
Magnetic Resonance Angiography/*methods
Male
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Edema/*epidemiology
Renal Artery/*pathology
Renal Artery Obstruction/*epidemiology/*pathology
Severity of Illness Index
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Oct;21(5):424-8. Epub 2010 May 18.Journal
European journal of internal medicineDOI
10.1016/j.ejim.2010.04.003PubMed ID
20816598Abstract
PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to determine the prevalence of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients presenting with acute ("flash") pulmonary oedema (FPE), without identifiable cause using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of renal arteries. A secondary goal was to correlate clinical parameters at presentation with the presence or absence of RAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with acute pulmonary oedema without identifiable cause prospectively underwent CE-MRA. >50% renal artery stenosis was considered significant. Clinical parameters (blood pressure, serum creatinine, history of hypertension/hyperlipidaemia) were compared in patients with and without RAS using an unpaired t-test. Results expressed; mean (+/-SD). RESULTS: 20 patients (4 male, 16 female, age 78.5+/-11 years) underwent CE-MRA. 9 patients (45%) had significant RAS (6 (30%) bilateral, 3 (15%) unilateral). Systolic BP was higher in patients with RAS (192+/-38 mm Hg) than those without (134+/-30 mm Hg) (p<.005). Diastolic BP was higher in patients with RAS (102+/-23 mm Hg) than those without (76+/-17 mm Hg) (p<.01). All patients with RAS and 6/11(55%) patients without RAS had a history of hypertension. No significant difference in creatinine or hyperlipidaemia history was observed. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RAS in patients presenting with FPE is 45%. The diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained acute pulmonary oedema, particularly if hypertensive at presentation.Language
engISSN
1879-0828 (Electronic)0953-6205 (Linking)
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ejim.2010.04.003
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
- Authors: Marchand B, Hernandez-Hoyos M, Orkisz M, Douek P
- Issue date: 2000 Dec
- Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE-MRA.
- Authors: Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Glickerman DJ, Pipavath S, Hoogeveen RM
- Issue date: 2007 Oct
- Technology insight: Clinical role of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis and management of renal artery stenosis.
- Authors: Dellegrottaglie S, Sanz J, Rajagopalan S
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Unenhanced respiratory-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of renal artery in hypertensive patients using true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique compared with contrast-enhanced MRA.
- Authors: Zhang W, Lin J, Wang S, Lv P, Wang L, Liu H, Chen C, Zeng M
- Issue date: 2014 Sep-Oct
- Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.
- Authors: Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Woodrum DA, Stanley DW, Takei N, Miyoshi M, Sun W
- Issue date: 2010 Jun