Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorgan, Noel
dc.contributor.authorShields, Carol L
dc.contributor.authorMashayekhi, Arman
dc.contributor.authorShields, Jerry A
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-01T10:40:14Z
dc.date.available2012-02-01T10:40:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-01T10:40:14Z
dc.identifier.citationCurr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 May;21(3):233-8.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1531-7021 (Electronic)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1040-8738 (Linking)en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid20393294en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283386687en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/207754
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE OF REVIEW: Radiation maculopathy is a sight-limiting consequence of radiotherapy in the management of uveal melanoma and other intraocular tumors. In this review, we consider clinical, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic findings, propose a classification for radiation maculopathy and discuss the management of this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Radiation macular edema (RME) can be classified by optical coherence tomography into noncystoid or cystoid edema, with foveolar or extrafoveolar involvement. Optical coherence tomographic grading of RME has been found to correlate with visual acuity. Focal argon laser might have some limited benefit in the treatment of RME. Intravitreal triamcinolone and intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents can be of short-term benefit in the treatment of RME. In a randomized controlled trial, periocular triamcinolone significantly reduced rates of RME and vision loss up to 18 months following plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. SUMMARY: Currently, there is no proven treatment for established RME, though periocular triamcinolone has been shown to have a preventive benefit. An accepted classification system for radiation maculopathy would be of benefit in planning and comparing future treatment trials.
dc.language.isoengen_GB
dc.subject.meshFluorescein Angiographyen_GB
dc.subject.meshHumansen_GB
dc.subject.meshRadiation Injuries/*classification/etiology/*therapyen_GB
dc.subject.meshRadiotherapy/*adverse effectsen_GB
dc.subject.meshRetina/*radiation effectsen_GB
dc.subject.meshRetinal Diseases/*classification/etiology/*therapyen_GB
dc.subject.meshTomography, Optical Coherenceen_GB
dc.subject.meshUveal Neoplasms/radiotherapyen_GB
dc.titleClassification and treatment of radiation maculopathy.en_GB
dc.contributor.departmentRoyal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Noel.Horgan@rveeh.ieen_GB
dc.identifier.journalCurrent opinion in ophthalmologyen_GB
dc.description.provinceLeinster
html.description.abstractPURPOSE OF REVIEW: Radiation maculopathy is a sight-limiting consequence of radiotherapy in the management of uveal melanoma and other intraocular tumors. In this review, we consider clinical, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic findings, propose a classification for radiation maculopathy and discuss the management of this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Radiation macular edema (RME) can be classified by optical coherence tomography into noncystoid or cystoid edema, with foveolar or extrafoveolar involvement. Optical coherence tomographic grading of RME has been found to correlate with visual acuity. Focal argon laser might have some limited benefit in the treatment of RME. Intravitreal triamcinolone and intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents can be of short-term benefit in the treatment of RME. In a randomized controlled trial, periocular triamcinolone significantly reduced rates of RME and vision loss up to 18 months following plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. SUMMARY: Currently, there is no proven treatment for established RME, though periocular triamcinolone has been shown to have a preventive benefit. An accepted classification system for radiation maculopathy would be of benefit in planning and comparing future treatment trials.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record