Selective fine needle aspiration of parotid masses. FNA should be performed in all patients older than 60 years.
Affiliation
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. skieran@rcsi.ieIssue Date
2012-02-01T10:40:12ZMeSH
Adenolymphoma/epidemiology/*pathologyAdenoma, Pleomorphic/epidemiology/*pathology
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology/*secondary
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Parotid Gland/*pathology/surgery
Parotid Neoplasms/epidemiology/*pathology/secondary/surgery
Patient Selection
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology/*pathology
Young Adult
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Sep;124(9):975-9. Epub 2010 May 25.Journal
The Journal of laryngology and otologyDOI
10.1017/S0022215110001088PubMed ID
20497621Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The exact role of fine needle aspiration in the pre-operative assessment of patients presenting with parotid masses is controversial. Some surgeons propose that fine needle aspiration be performed only selectively in those patients with likely malignant disease, whilst others recommend it for all patients presenting with such a mass. Intuitively, one would expect older patients to be more likely to suffer from primary malignant parotid tumours and secondary deposits of malignant skin tumours. Therefore, we hypothesised that older patients with a parotid mass should undergo fine needle aspiration regardless of their medical history. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 197 consecutive parotidectomies to test this hypothesis. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients (61.4 per cent) were diagnosed with benign disease, whilst 76 (38.6 per cent) were diagnosed with malignant disease. Eighty-three per cent of patients aged 60 years or younger had benign disease, as opposed to 35.6 per cent of patients aged more than 60 years. Malignant disease occurred more commonly in patients older than 60 years (odds ratio 8.962, 95 per cent confidence interval 4.607-17.434). CONCLUSION: In patients with a parotid mass, fine needle aspiration should be performed on all those aged 60 years or older.Language
engISSN
1748-5460 (Electronic)0022-2151 (Linking)
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/S0022215110001088
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- [Sensitivity and specificity of fine needle aspiration biopsy in parotid masses].
- Authors: Uğuz MZ, Onal HK, Eroğlu OO, Etit D
- Issue date: 2007
- [Evaluation of the fine needle aspiration biopsy in the presurgical diagnosis of tumors of the parotid gland].
- Authors: Altuna Mariezkurrena X, Gorostiaga Aznar F, Zulueta Lizaur A, Algaba Guimerá J
- Issue date: 2006
- Clinicopathological analysis of parotid masses: six-year experience of a tertiary center.
- Authors: Yazici D, Guney Z, Coktu MY, Yildirim I, Arikan OK
- Issue date: 2020 Feb
- [An evaluation of parotid gland masses].
- Authors: Yaşar H, Ozkul H, Verim A, Ilhan E, Kökten N, Dereci G
- Issue date: 2007
- Parotid surgery: review of 107 tumors (1990-2002).
- Authors: Ferreira PC, Amarante JM, Rodrigues JM, Pinho CJ, Cardoso MA, Reis JC
- Issue date: 2005 Jul-Aug