Impaired information processing speed and attention allocation in multiple sclerosis patients versus controls: a high-density EEG study.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
Department of Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, University College, Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Robert.whelan@tcd.ieIssue Date
2012-02-01T10:28:22ZMeSH
Acoustic Stimulation/methodsAdult
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/*etiology
Cognition Disorders/*etiology
Electroencephalography/methods
Event-Related Potentials, P300/physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Processes/*physiology
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis/*complications
Neuropsychological Tests
Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
Photic Stimulation/methods
Reaction Time/*physiology
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
J Neurol Sci. 2010 Jun 15;293(1-2):45-50.Journal
Journal of the neurological sciencesDOI
10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.010PubMed ID
20399448Abstract
BACKGROUND: The no-go P3a is a variant of the P300 event-related potential (ERP) that indexes speed of information processing and attention allocation. The aim of this study was to compare ERP findings with results from the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) and to quantify latency, amplitude and topographical differences in P3a ERP components between multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four subjects (20 relapsing remitting (RRMS) patients, 20 secondary progressive (SPMS) patients and 34 controls) completed a three-stimulus oddball paradigm (target, standard, and non-target). Subjects participated in separate visual and auditory tasks while data were recorded from 134 EEG channels. Latency differences were tested using an ANCOVA. Topographical differences were tested using statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: Visual P3a amplitude correlated with PASAT score in all MS patients over frontal and parietal areas. There were significant differences in latency, amplitude, and topography between MS patients and controls in the visual condition. RRMS and SPMS patients differed in visual P3a latency and amplitude at frontal and parietal scalp regions. In the auditory condition, there were latency differences between MS patients and controls only over the parietal region. CONCLUSION: The present results demonstrate that information processing speed and attention allocation are impaired in MS.Language
engISSN
1878-5883 (Electronic)0022-510X (Linking)
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.010
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Change in PASAT performance correlates with change in P3 ERP amplitude over a 12-month period in multiple sclerosis patients.
- Authors: Kiiski H, Reilly RB, Lonergan R, Kelly S, O'Brien M, Kinsella K, Bramham J, Burke T, O'Donnchadha S, Nolan H, Hutchinson M, Tubridy N, Whelan R
- Issue date: 2011 Jun 15
- Neuropsychological and electrophysiological indices of neurocognitive dysfunction in bipolar II disorder.
- Authors: Andersson S, Barder HE, Hellvin T, Løvdahl H, Malt UF
- Issue date: 2008 Dec
- Preliminary evidence for correlation between PASAT performance and P3a and P3b amplitudes in progressive multiple sclerosis.
- Authors: Kiiski H, Whelan R, Lonergan R, Nolan H, Kinsella K, Hutchinson M, Tubridy N, Reilly RB
- Issue date: 2011 May
- A high-density ERP study reveals latency, amplitude, and topographical differences in multiple sclerosis patients versus controls.
- Authors: Whelan R, Lonergan R, Kiiski H, Nolan H, Kinsella K, Bramham J, O'Brien M, Reilly RB, Hutchinson M, Tubridy N
- Issue date: 2010 Sep
- Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
- Authors: Wise V, McFarlane AC, Clark CR, Battersby M
- Issue date: 2009 Oct