Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKellett, John
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T11:25:00Z
dc.date.available2012-01-26T11:25:00Z
dc.date.issued2009-09
dc.identifier.citationHospital medicine (Part 2): what would improve acute hospital care? 2009, 20 (5):465-9 Eur. J. Intern. Med.en
dc.identifier.issn1879-0828
dc.identifier.pmid19712845
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejim.2008.12.015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/205012
dc.description.abstractThere are so many obvious delays and inefficiencies in our traditional system of acute hospital care; it is clear that if outcomes are to be improved prompt accurate assessment immediately followed by competent and efficient treatment is essential. Early warning scores (EWS) help detect acutely ill patients who are seriously ill and likely to deteriorate. However, it is not known if any EWS has universal applicability to all patient populations. The benefit of Rapid Response Systems (RRS) such as Medical Emergency Teams has yet to be proven, possibly because doctors and nurses are reluctant to call the RRS for help. Reconfiguration of care delivery in an Acute Medical Assessment Unit has been suggested as a "proactive" alternative to the "reactive" approach of RRS. This method ensures every patient is in an appropriate and safe environment from the moment of first contact with the hospital. Further research is needed into what interventions are most effective in preventing the deterioration and/or resuscitating seriously ill patients. Although physicians expert in hospital care decrease the cost and length of hospitalization without compromising outcomes hospital care will continue to be both expensive and potentially dangerous.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095362050800349Xen
dc.subject.meshEmergency Service, Hospital
dc.subject.meshHospital Mortality
dc.subject.meshHospital Rapid Response Team
dc.subject.meshHospitalization
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshOutcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subject.meshTriage
dc.titleHospital medicine (Part 2): what would improve acute hospital care?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Nenagh Hospital, Nenagh, County Tipperary, Ireland. jgkellett@eircom.neten
dc.identifier.journalEuropean journal of internal medicineen
dc.description.provinceMunster
html.description.abstractThere are so many obvious delays and inefficiencies in our traditional system of acute hospital care; it is clear that if outcomes are to be improved prompt accurate assessment immediately followed by competent and efficient treatment is essential. Early warning scores (EWS) help detect acutely ill patients who are seriously ill and likely to deteriorate. However, it is not known if any EWS has universal applicability to all patient populations. The benefit of Rapid Response Systems (RRS) such as Medical Emergency Teams has yet to be proven, possibly because doctors and nurses are reluctant to call the RRS for help. Reconfiguration of care delivery in an Acute Medical Assessment Unit has been suggested as a "proactive" alternative to the "reactive" approach of RRS. This method ensures every patient is in an appropriate and safe environment from the moment of first contact with the hospital. Further research is needed into what interventions are most effective in preventing the deterioration and/or resuscitating seriously ill patients. Although physicians expert in hospital care decrease the cost and length of hospitalization without compromising outcomes hospital care will continue to be both expensive and potentially dangerous.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record