Comparison of the EntericBio multiplex PCR system with routine culture for detection of bacterial enteric pathogens.
AffiliationDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Nucleic Acid Hybridization
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Predictive Value of Tests
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Sensitivity and Specificity
MetadataShow full item record
CitationComparison of the EntericBio multiplex PCR system with routine culture for detection of bacterial enteric pathogens. 2009, 47 (11):3449-53 J. Clin. Microbiol.
JournalJournal of clinical microbiology
AbstractThe EntericBio system uses a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Campylobacter spp., Salmonella enterica, Shigella spp., and Escherichia coli O157 from feces. It combines overnight broth enrichment with PCR amplification and detection by hybridization. An evaluation of this system was conducted by comparing the results obtained with the system with those obtained by routine culture, supplemented with alternative PCR detection methods. In a study of 773 samples, routine culture and the EntericBio system yielded 94.6 and 92.4% negative results, respectively. Forty-two samples had positive results by culture, and all of these were positive with the EntericBio system. This system detected an additional 17 positive samples (Campylobacter spp., n = 12; Shigella spp., n = 1; E. coli O157, n = 4), but the results for 5 samples (Campylobacter spp., n = 2; Shigella spp., n = 1; E. coli O157, n = 2) could not be confirmed. The target for Shigella spp. detected by the EntericBio system is the ipaH gene, and the molecular indication of the presence of Shigella spp. was investigated by sequence analysis, which confirmed that the ipaH gene was present in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from the patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 99.3%, 91.5%, and 100%, respectively. Turnaround times were significantly reduced with the EntericBio system, and a result was available between 24 and 32 h after receipt of the sample in the laboratory. In addition, the amount of laboratory waste was significantly reduced by use of this system. In summary, the EntericBio system proved convenient to use, more sensitive than the conventional culture used in this study, and highly specific; and it generated results significantly faster than routine culture for the pathogens tested.
- Validation of the EntericBio Panel II® multiplex polymerase chain reaction system for detection of Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and verotoxigenic E. coli for use in a clinical diagnostic setting.
- Authors: Koziel M, Corcoran D, O'Callaghan I, Sleator RD, Lucey B
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- Improved detection of bacterial pathogens in patients presenting with gastroenteritis by use of the EntericBio real-time Gastro Panel I assay.
- Authors: Koziel M, Kiely R, Blake L, O'Callaghan I, Corcoran GD, Lucey B, Sleator RD
- Issue date: 2013 Aug
- Multicenter evaluation of the BD max enteric bacterial panel PCR assay for rapid detection of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp. (C. jejuni and C. coli), and Shiga toxin 1 and 2 genes.
- Authors: Harrington SM, Buchan BW, Doern C, Fader R, Ferraro MJ, Pillai DR, Rychert J, Doyle L, Lainesse A, Karchmer T, Mortensen JE
- Issue date: 2015 May
- Network-wide analysis of the Serosep EntericBio Gastro Panel 2 for the detection of enteric pathogens in Public Health Wales microbiology laboratories.
- Authors: Holliday LR, Perry MD
- Issue date: 2022 May
- Comparison of the BD MAX enteric bacterial panel to routine culture methods for detection of Campylobacter, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (O157), Salmonella, and Shigella isolates in preserved stool specimens.
- Authors: Anderson NW, Buchan BW, Ledeboer NA
- Issue date: 2014 Apr