The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
AffiliationPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Aged, 80 and over
Home Care Services
International Normalized Ratio
Reproducibility of Results
MetadataShow full item record
CitationThe reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring. 2010, 32 (1 Pt 1):e26-33 Int J Lab Hematol
JournalInternational journal of laboratory hematology
AbstractThe development of point-of-care (POC) testing devices enables patients to test their own international normalized ratio (INR) at home. However, previous studies have shown that when compared with clinical laboratory values, statistically significant differences may occur between the two methods of INR measurement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the CoaguChek S and XS POC meters relative to clinical laboratory measurements. As part of a randomized, crossover patient self-testing (PST) study at Cork University Hospital, patients were randomized to 6 months PST or 6 months routine care by the anticoagulation management service. During the PST arm of the study, patients measured their INR at home using the CoaguChek S or XS POC meter. External quality control was performed at enrollment, 2 months and 4 months by comparing the POC measured INR with the laboratory determined value. One hundred and fifty-one patients provided 673 paired samples. Good correlation was shown between the two methods of determination (r = 0.91), however, statistically significant differences did occur. A Bland-Altman plot illustrated good agreement of INR values between 2.0 and 3.5 INR units but there was increasing disagreement as the INR rose above 3.5. Eighty-seven per cent of all dual measurements were within the recommended 0.5 INR units of each other. This study adds to the growing evidence that POC testing is a reliable and safe alternative to hospital laboratory monitoring but highlights the importance of external quality control when these devices are used for monitoring oral anticoagulation.
- Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.
- Authors: Sobieraj-Teague M, Daniel D, Farrelly B, Coghlan D, Gallus A
- Issue date: 2009 Apr
- Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
- Authors: Greenway A, Ignjatovic V, Summerhayes R, Newall F, Burgess J, DeRosa L, Monagle P
- Issue date: 2009 Jul
- Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
- Authors: Bauman ME, Black KL, Massicotte MP, Bauman ML, Kuhle S, Howlett-Clyne S, Cembrowski GS, Bajzar L
- Issue date: 2008 Jun
- Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children.
- Authors: Paioni P, Kroiss S, Kägi E, Bergsträsser E, Fasnacht M, Bauersfeld U, Schmugge M, Albisetti M
- Issue date: 2009
- Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring.
- Authors: Gardiner C, Williams K, Mackie IJ, Machin SJ, Cohen H
- Issue date: 2005 Jan