Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Owen J
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Edward
dc.contributor.authorMaher, Michael M
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-05T12:05:12Z
dc.date.available2012-01-05T12:05:12Z
dc.date.issued2010-10
dc.identifier.citationImaging of hematuria. 2010, 195 (4):W263-7 AJR Am J Roentgenolen
dc.identifier.issn1546-3141
dc.identifier.pmid20858787
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.09.4181
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/200236
dc.descriptionOBJECTIVE: In this article, we will discuss the current status of imaging in patients with hematuria of urologic origin. Issues impacting evaluation of these patients with radiography, excretory urography, retrograde pyelography, and sonography will be discussed. CONCLUSION: Conventional radiography has no role in the detection of renal or urothelial carcinoma. Low-dose CT offers much greater sensitivities for the detection of urinary tract calculi than radiography at doses equivalent to conventional radiography. Ultrasound alone is insufficient for imaging of hematuria. Using ultrasound alone, it is often difficult to differentiate renal transitional cell carcinoma from other causes of filling defects of the renal collecting system such as blood clots, sloughed papillae, or fungus balls. The prominence of the role of excretory urography in the evaluation of patients with hematuria has diminished, and MDCT urography is now preferred to excretory urography in most cases.en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: In this article, we will discuss the current status of imaging in patients with hematuria of urologic origin. Issues impacting evaluation of these patients with radiography, excretory urography, retrograde pyelography, and sonography will be discussed. CONCLUSION: Conventional radiography has no role in the detection of renal or urothelial carcinoma. Low-dose CT offers much greater sensitivities for the detection of urinary tract calculi than radiography at doses equivalent to conventional radiography. Ultrasound alone is insufficient for imaging of hematuria. Using ultrasound alone, it is often difficult to differentiate renal transitional cell carcinoma from other causes of filling defects of the renal collecting system such as blood clots, sloughed papillae, or fungus balls. The prominence of the role of excretory urography in the evaluation of patients with hematuria has diminished, and MDCT urography is now preferred to excretory urography in most cases.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ajronline.org/content/195/4/W263.full.pdf+htmlen
dc.subject.meshDiagnostic Imaging
dc.subject.meshHematuria
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subject.meshTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subject.meshUrography
dc.subject.meshUrologic Diseases
dc.titleImaging of hematuria.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.en
dc.identifier.journalAJR. American journal of roentgenologyen
dc.description.provinceMunster
html.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: In this article, we will discuss the current status of imaging in patients with hematuria of urologic origin. Issues impacting evaluation of these patients with radiography, excretory urography, retrograde pyelography, and sonography will be discussed. CONCLUSION: Conventional radiography has no role in the detection of renal or urothelial carcinoma. Low-dose CT offers much greater sensitivities for the detection of urinary tract calculi than radiography at doses equivalent to conventional radiography. Ultrasound alone is insufficient for imaging of hematuria. Using ultrasound alone, it is often difficult to differentiate renal transitional cell carcinoma from other causes of filling defects of the renal collecting system such as blood clots, sloughed papillae, or fungus balls. The prominence of the role of excretory urography in the evaluation of patients with hematuria has diminished, and MDCT urography is now preferred to excretory urography in most cases.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record