Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.Issue Date
2011-09-05
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement. 2011:notEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod BiolJournal
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biologyDOI
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.002PubMed ID
21899943Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of women presenting with reduced fetal movement (RFM) during the third trimester, specifically in relation to the diagnostic capacity of non-stress cardiotocography (CTG) used as the primary investigation in this clinical scenario. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of pregnancy outcomes of all women ≥28 weeks' gestation with singleton pregnancies presenting during one calendar year with maternal perception of RFM, all of whom underwent CTG at presentation. Main outcome measures included: obstetric intervention (induction of labour, spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery, emergency caesarean section), and perinatal outcome (subsequent perinatal death, low Apgar scores (<7(5)), neonatal resuscitation and NICU admission). RESULTS: In all, 524 women presented with RFM and a live fetus, representing 7% of the antenatal obstetric population; 284 women (54%) were nulliparous. The reassuring CTG group comprised 482 (92%) women in whom initial CTG was reassuring and 15 (3%) where a repeat tracing within 1h was reassuring. The non-reassuring/abnormal CTG group (n=27, 5%) either underwent emergency delivery or comprehensive serial fetal assessment; this group had significantly higher rates of emergency caesarean delivery, neonatal resuscitation and NICU admission; the incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants did not differ significantly. No perinatal death occurred in either group following CTG. CONCLUSION: Normal non-stress CTG is a reliable screening indicator of fetal wellbeing in women presenting with perception of RFM in the third trimester; abnormal pregnancy outcomes were more common when initial CTG was abnormal or persistently non-reassuring.Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1872-7654ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.002
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
- Authors: Salamalekis E, Siristatidis C, Vasios G, Saloum J, Giannaris D, Chrelias C, Prentza A, Koutsouris D
- Issue date: 2006 Apr
- The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
- Authors: Devane D, Lalor J, Bonnar J
- Issue date: 2007 Feb
- A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
- Authors: Ojala K, Vääräsmäki M, Mäkikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A
- Issue date: 2006 Apr
- Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
- Authors: Kessler J, Moster D, Albrechtsen S
- Issue date: 2014 Feb
- Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
- Authors: Rhöse S, Heinis AM, Vandenbussche F, van Drongelen J, van Dillen J
- Issue date: 2014 Jun