A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Merchant, NGroves, A
Larkman, D J
Counsell, S J
Thomson, M A
Doria, V
Groppo, M
Arichi, T
Foreman, S
Herlihy, D J
Hajnal, J V
Srinivasan, L
Foran, A
Rutherford, M
Edwards, A D
Boardman, J P
Affiliation
Imaging Sciences Department, Division of Clinical Sciences, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.Issue Date
2009-12MeSH
Birth WeightContinuity of Patient Care
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Intensive Care, Neonatal
Intubation, Intratracheal
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
Patient Care Team
Patient Positioning
Patient-Centered Care
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Safety
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. 2009, 85 (12):779-83 Early Hum. Dev.Journal
Early human developmentDOI
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.10.007PubMed ID
19926413Abstract
Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (weight <1500 g) are increasingly cared for without prolonged periods of positive pressure ventilation (PPV).To develop a system for 3.0 T magnetic resonance (MR) image acquisition from VLBW infants who are not receiving PPV, and to test the clinical stability of a consecutive cohort of such infants.
Seventy VLBW infants whose median weight at image acquisition was 940 g (590-1490) underwent brain MR imaging with the developed care system as participants in research. Twenty infants (29%) received nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), 28 (40%) received supplemental oxygen by nasal cannulae, and 22 (31%) breathed spontaneously in air during the MR examination.
There were no significant adverse events. Seventy-six percent had none or transient self-correcting oxygen desaturations. Desaturations that required interruption of the scan for assessment were less common among infants receiving nCPAP (2/20) or breathing spontaneously in air (2/22), compared with those receiving nasal cannulae oxygen (13/28), p=0.003. Sixty-four (91%) infants had an axillary temperature > or =36 degrees C at completion of the scan (lowest 35.7 degrees C), There was no relationship between weight (p=0.167) or use of nCPAP (p=0.453) and axillary temperature <36 degrees C. No infant became hyperthermic.
VLBW infants who do not require ventilation by endotracheal tube can be imaged successfully and safely at 3.0 T, including those receiving nCPAP from a customised system.
Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1872-6232ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.10.007
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Neonatal care of very-low-birthweight infants in special-care units and neonatal intensive-care units in Stockholm. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus mechanical ventilation: gains and losses.
- Authors: Jónsson B, Katz-Salamon M, Faxelius G, Broberger U, Lagercrantz H
- Issue date: 1997 Apr
- Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants.
- Authors: Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN
- Issue date: 2001 Apr
- Is nCPAP of value in extreme preterms with no access to neonatal intensive care?
- Authors: Pieper CH, Smith J, Maree D, Pohl FC
- Issue date: 2003 Jun
- A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs.
- Authors: Davis P, Davies M, Faber B
- Issue date: 2001 Sep
- Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.
- Authors: Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG
- Issue date: 2000