A multi-centre, prospective, clinical in-market evaluation to assess the performance of Opsite™ Post-Op Visible dressings.
Authors
O'Brien, GillianBuckley, Karen
Vanwalleghem, Geert
Vanrenterghem, Dirk
Dharma, Hussein
Winter, Rachael L
Douglass, Jude
Affiliation
Naas General Hospital, Ireland. gillian.obrien@hse.ieIssue Date
2010-10MeSH
AdultAged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occlusive Dressings
Postoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Wound Healing
Young Adult
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
A multi-centre, prospective, clinical in-market evaluation to assess the performance of Opsite™ Post-Op Visible dressings. 2010, 7 (5):329-37 Int Wound JJournal
International wound journalDOI
10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00689.xPubMed ID
20636341Additional Links
10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00689.xAbstract
The aim of this study was to assess the performance of Opsite™ Post-Op Visible as a post-surgical dressing in a typical clinical setting. In this multi-centre clinical evaluation, patients who underwent clean surgery were treated with Opsite Post-Op Visible dressing. Duration of dressing wear, visibility through the dressing and ability to handle exudate were assessed and the product was rated in comparison with those normally used. A total of 64 patients were recruited. Mean wear time was 4·5 days. Exudate management was rated very good or good at 96% of assessments. Visibility of the incision site was rated as very good or good at 72%, and as acceptable at 24%, of assessments. Patient comfort was rated very comfortable (63%) or comfortable (37%) at all assessments. Dressings were generally rated as satisfactory or exceeding expectations with clinicians stating that the Opsite Post-Op Visible dressing was better than the dressing they routinely used for 92% of patients. Opsite Post-Op Visible dressing is an innovative dressing combining good visibility with exudate management and patient comfort. It was found to have adequate wear time, visibility and exudate management properties making it suitable for use on a variety of surgical incision sites.Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1742-481Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00689.x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients.
- Authors: Pickles S, McAllister E, McCullagh G, Nieroba TJ
- Issue date: 2022 May
- Comparative study of innovative postoperative wound dressings after total knee arthroplasty.
- Authors: Dobbelaere A, Schuermans N, Smet S, Van Der Straeten C, Victor J
- Issue date: 2015 Sep
- An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients.
- Authors: Barrett S, Callaghan R, Chadwick P, Haycocks S, Rippon M, Stephen-Haynes J, Simm S
- Issue date: 2018 Feb 2
- Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Authors: López-Parra M, Gil-Rey D, López-González E, González-Rodríguez EM, Simó-Sánchez I, Zamora-Carmona F, Roqueta-Andreu L, Arizu-Puigvert M, Abril-Sabater D, Moreno-Álvarez À, López-Bonet À, López-Hidalgo G, Costa-Ventura H, García-Pardo L, Rico-Liberato M, García-Borràs M, Arnal-Leris MT, Sianes-Gallén M, Vives R
- Issue date: 2018 Jul 5
- Effect of three wound dressings on infection, healing comfort, and cost in patients with sternotomy wounds: a randomized trial.
- Authors: Wynne R, Botti M, Stedman H, Holsworth L, Harinos M, Flavell O, Manterfield C
- Issue date: 2004 Jan