Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
AffiliationUniversity College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland. email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Optics and Photonics
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiographic Image Enhancement
MetadataShow full item record
CitationVariations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration. 2010, 195 (1):181-7 AJR Am J Roentgenol
JournalAJR. American journal of roentgenology
AbstractQuality assurance in medical imaging is directly beneficial to image quality. Diagnostic images are frequently displayed on secondary-class displays that have minimal or no regular quality assurance programs, and treatment decisions are being made from these display types. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of calibration on physical and psychophysical performance of liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and the extent of potential variance across various types of LCDs.
Three display types were evaluated from Hewlett Packard, Viewsonic, and NEC, which totalled 36 LCDs. These displays were calibrated to the DICOM gray scale standard display function using a VeriLum photometer and associated software under the same ambient room conditions. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18 test patterns were used to measure minimum and maximum luminance, contrast ratios, luminance response, veiling glare (physical and psychophysical), psychophysical noise, spatial resolution, and display uniformity.
Improvements after calibration were noted in all display types for luminance response and psychophysical evaluations of veiling glare. Minimum luminance, contrast ratios, and display uniformity improvements were noted in two separate display types. The only significant reduction in performance was noted for physical evaluations of veiling glare.
The data presented show that calibration has a significant impact on the brightness and contrast of displays, and other display parameters are influenced by this. The amount of variation in performance that was still evident after calibration is of concern.
- Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays.
- Authors: Samei E, Wright SL
- Issue date: 2006 Mar
- Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.
- Authors: Fetterly KA, Blume HR, Flynn MJ, Samei E
- Issue date: 2008 Jun
- Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
- Authors: Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley-Stevens DM, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff RA, Wang J, Willis CE, AAPM TG18.
- Issue date: 2005 Apr
- Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
- Authors: Jung H, Kim HJ, Kang WS, Yoo SK, Fujioka K, Hasegawa M, Samei E
- Issue date: 2004 Jul
- Performance evaluation of soft copy display systems according to AAPM TG18 protocol.
- Authors: Olgar T, Kamberli E
- Issue date: 2013 Jun