Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.
AuthorsToomey, Rachel J
Ryan, John T
McEntee, Mark F
Evanoff, Michael G
Chakraborty, Dev P
McNulty, Jonathan P
Manning, David J
Thomas, Edel M
Brennan, Patrick C
AffiliationUniversity College Dublin School of Medicine and Medical Science, Health Science Centre, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland. firstname.lastname@example.org
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
MetadataShow full item record
CitationDiagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. 2010, 194 (2):469-74 AJR Am J Roentgenol
JournalAJR. American journal of roentgenology
AbstractOrthopedic injury and intracranial hemorrhage are commonly encountered in emergency radiology, and accurate and timely diagnosis is important. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of handheld computing devices is comparable to that of monitors that might be used in emergency teleconsultation.
Two handheld devices, a Dell Axim personal digital assistant (PDA) and an Apple iPod Touch device, were studied. The diagnostic efficacy of each device was tested against that of secondary-class monitors (primary class being clinical workstation display) for each of two image types-posteroanterior wrist radiographs and slices from CT of the brain-yielding four separate observer performance studies. Participants read a bank of 30 wrist or brain images searching for a specific abnormality (distal radial fracture, fresh intracranial bleed) and rated their confidence in their decisions. A total of 168 readings by examining radiologists of the American Board of Radiology were gathered, and the results were subjected to receiver operating characteristics analysis.
In the PDA brain CT study, the scores of PDA readings were significantly higher than those of monitor readings for all observers (p < or = 0.01) and for radiologists who were not neuroradiology specialists (p < or = 0.05). No statistically significant differences between handheld device and monitor findings were found for the PDA wrist images or in the iPod Touch device studies, although some comparisons approached significance.
Handheld devices show promise in the field of emergency teleconsultation for detection of basic orthopedic injuries and intracranial hemorrhage. Further investigation is warranted.
- Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.
- Authors: Doyle AJ, Le Fevre J, Anderson GD
- Issue date: 2005 Dec
- Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study.
- Authors: McNulty JP, Ryan JT, Evanoff MG, Rainford LA
- Issue date: 2012 Aug
- The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting.
- Authors: John S, Poh AC, Lim TC, Chan EH, Chong le R
- Issue date: 2012 Oct
- Emergency CT brain: preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad.
- Authors: Mc Laughlin P, Neill SO, Fanning N, Mc Garrigle AM, Connor OJ, Wyse G, Maher MM
- Issue date: 2012 Apr
- Comparison of handheld devices for emergency radiology.
- Authors: McLaughlin P, McGarrigle AM, Maher MM
- Issue date: 2011 Apr