Satisfaction with inpatient treatment for first-episode psychosis among different ethnic groups: A report from the UK AeSOP study.
Authors
Boydell, JaneMorgan, Craig
Dutta, Rina
Jones, Barry
Alemseged, Fana
Dazzan, Paola
Morgan, Kevin
Doody, Gillian
Harrison, Glynn
Leff, Julian
Jones, Peter
Murray, Robin
Fearon, Paul
Affiliation
Psychosis Clinical Academic Group, Institute of Psychiatry, King's Health Partners, King's College London, UK.Issue Date
2010-09-17
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Satisfaction with inpatient treatment for first-episode psychosis among different ethnic groups: A report from the UK AeSOP study. 2010: Int J Soc PsychiatryJournal
The International journal of social psychiatryDOI
10.1177/0020764010382691PubMed ID
20851828Additional Links
doi: 10.1177/0020764010382691Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is concern about the level of satisfaction with mental healthcare among minority ethnic patients in the UK, particularly as black patients have more compulsory admissions to hospital. AIMS: To determine and compare levels of satisfaction with mental healthcare between patients from different ethnic groups in a three-centre study of first-onset psychosis. METHOD: Data were collected from 216 patients with first-episode psychosis and 101 caregivers from South London, Nottingham and Bristol, using the Acute Services Study Questionnaire (Patient and Relative Version) and measures of sociodemographic variables and insight. RESULTS: No differences were found between ethnic groups in most domains of satisfaction tested individually, including items relating to treatment by ward staff and number of domains rated as satisfactory. However, logistic regression modelling (adjusting for age, gender, social class, diagnostic category and compulsion) showed that black Caribbean patients did not believe that they were receiving the right treatment and were less satisfied with medication than white patients. Black African patients were less satisfied with non-pharmacological treatments than white patients. These findings were not explained by lack of insight or compulsory treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that black patients were less satisfied with specific aspects of treatment, particularly medication, but were equally satisfied with nursing and social care. Understanding the reasons behind this may improve the acceptability of psychiatric care to black minority ethnic groups.Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1741-2854ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/0020764010382691
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Ethnicity and power in the mental health system: experiences of white British and black Caribbean people with psychosis.
- Authors: Lawrence V, McCombie C, Nikolakopoulos G, Morgan C
- Issue date: 2021 Feb 5
- Patterns of illness and care over the 5 years following onset of psychosis in different ethnic groups; the GAP-5 study.
- Authors: Ajnakina O, Lally J, Di Forti M, Kolliakou A, Gardner-Sood P, Lopez-Morinigo J, Dazzan P, Pariante CM, Mondelli V, MacCabe J, David AS, Gaughran F, Murray RM, Vassos E
- Issue date: 2017 Sep
- Compulsory admission at first presentation to services for psychosis: does ethnicity still matter? Findings from two population-based studies of first episode psychosis.
- Authors: Oduola S, Craig TKJ, Das-Munshi J, Bourque F, Gayer-Anderson C, Morgan C
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- Ethnic differences in satisfaction with mental health services among representative people with psychosis in south London: PRiSM study 4.
- Authors: Parkman S, Davies S, Leese M, Phelan M, Thornicroft G
- Issue date: 1997 Sep
- Ethnic differences in risk of compulsory psychiatric admission among representative cases of psychosis in London.
- Authors: Davies S, Thornicroft G, Leese M, Higgingbotham A, Phelan M
- Issue date: 1996 Mar 2