• Collaborative pharmaceutical care in an Irish hospital: uncontrolled before-after study

      Grimes, Tamasine C; Deasy, Evelyn; Allen, Ann; O ’ Byrne, John; Delaney, Tim; Barragry, John; Breslin, Niall; Moloney, Eddie; Wall, Catherine (BMJ Quality & Safety, 2014-02)
      Background We investigated the benefits of the Collaborative Pharmaceutical Care in Tallaght Hospital (PACT) service versus standard ward-based clinical pharmacy in adult inpatients receiving acute medical care, particularly on prevalence of medication error and quality of prescribing. Methods Uncontrolled before-after study, undertaken in consecutive adult medical inpatients admitted and discharged alive, using at least three medications. Standard care involved clinical pharmacists being ward-based, contributing to medication history taking and prescription review, but not involved at discharge. The innovative PACT intervention involved clinical pharmacists being team-based, leading admission and discharge medication reconciliation and undertaking prescription review. Primary outcome measures were prevalence per patient of medication error and potentially severe error. Secondary measures included quality of prescribing using the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) in patients aged ≥65 years. Findings Some 233 patients (112 PACT, 121 standard) were included. PACT decreased the prevalence of any medication error at discharge (adjusted OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.15)); number needed to treat (NNT) 3 (95% CI 2 to 3) and no PACT patient experienced a potentially severe error (NNT 20, 95% CI 10 to 142). In patients aged ≥65 years (n=108), PACT improved the MAI score from preadmission to discharge (Mann–Whitney U p<0.05; PACT median −1, IQR −3.75 to 0; standard care median +1, IQR −1 to +6). Conclusions PACT, a collaborative model of pharmaceutical care involving medication reconciliation and review, delivered by clinical pharmacists and physicians, at admission, during inpatient care and at discharge was protective against potentially severe medication errors in acute medical patients and improved the quality of prescribing in older patients.
    • A patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessing quality of care in the urology hospital outpatient setting

      Alsinnawi, M; Dowling, CM; McKeown, S; Flynn, R; McDermott, TED; Grainger, R; Thornhill, JA (Irish Medical Journal, 2014-09)
      A prospective blind PROM (patient reported outcome measure) study performed in our urology department examined the outpatient-clinic experience. 104 questionnaires were completed. 23 patients (22%) felt the waiting times for appointments was excessive. 13 patients (13%) experienced difficulty in contacting administrative staff. 98 patients (94%) considered the waiting areas good but 31 patients (31%) considered lack of privacy an issue. Consultants saw 65 patients (63%). 62 patients (60%) expected to be seen by a consultant. 32 patients (31%) felt consultation with a different doctor on return visits was unsatisfactory. 76 patients (73%) â fully trustedâ their doctors. 78 patients (75%) rated their visit excellent, 10 patients (10%) added comments. Despite frustration with waiting times, the experience of patients reflects a positive rapport and trust between patient and doctor.