Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaharaj, C H
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, B D
dc.contributor.authorHarte, B H
dc.contributor.authorLaffey, J G
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-11T12:02:57Z
dc.date.available2011-04-11T12:02:57Z
dc.date.issued2006-05
dc.identifier.citationEvaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study. 2006, 61 (5):469-77 Anaesthesiaen
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409
dc.identifier.pmid16674623
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04547.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/127939
dc.description.abstractThe Airtraq Laryngoscope is a novel intubation device which allows visualisation of the vocal cords without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes. We compared the Airtraq with the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Twenty-five anaesthetists were allowed up to three attempts to intubate the trachea in each of three laryngoscopy scenarios using a Laerdal Intubation Trainer followed by five scenarios using a Laerdal SimMan Manikin. Each anaesthetist then performed tracheal intubation of the normal airway a second time to characterise the learning curve. In the simulated easy laryngoscopy scenarios, there was no difference between the Airtraq and the Macintosh in success of tracheal intubation. The time taken to intubate at the end of the protocol was significantly lower using the Airtraq (9.5 (6.7) vs. 14.2 (7.4) s), demonstrating a rapid acquisition of skills. In the simulated difficult laryngoscopy scenarios, the Airtraq was more successful in achieving tracheal intubation, required less time to intubate successfully, caused less dental trauma, and was considered by the anaesthetists to be easier to use.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshConstriction, Pathologic
dc.subject.meshCross-Over Studies
dc.subject.meshEdema
dc.subject.meshEquipment Design
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshImmobilization
dc.subject.meshIntubation, Intratracheal
dc.subject.meshLaryngoscopes
dc.subject.meshLaryngoscopy
dc.subject.meshManikins
dc.subject.meshPharyngeal Diseases
dc.subject.meshTongue Diseases
dc.subject.meshTrismus
dc.titleEvaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital Galway, Ireland.en
dc.identifier.journalAnaesthesiaen
dc.description.provinceConnacht
html.description.abstractThe Airtraq Laryngoscope is a novel intubation device which allows visualisation of the vocal cords without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes. We compared the Airtraq with the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Twenty-five anaesthetists were allowed up to three attempts to intubate the trachea in each of three laryngoscopy scenarios using a Laerdal Intubation Trainer followed by five scenarios using a Laerdal SimMan Manikin. Each anaesthetist then performed tracheal intubation of the normal airway a second time to characterise the learning curve. In the simulated easy laryngoscopy scenarios, there was no difference between the Airtraq and the Macintosh in success of tracheal intubation. The time taken to intubate at the end of the protocol was significantly lower using the Airtraq (9.5 (6.7) vs. 14.2 (7.4) s), demonstrating a rapid acquisition of skills. In the simulated difficult laryngoscopy scenarios, the Airtraq was more successful in achieving tracheal intubation, required less time to intubate successfully, caused less dental trauma, and was considered by the anaesthetists to be easier to use.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record