Prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Affiliation
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. hhumphreys@rcsi.ieIssue Date
2009-02MeSH
Cross InfectionEnvironmental Microbiology
Handwashing
Humans
Infection Control
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Patient Isolation
Staphylococcal Infections
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. 2009, 15 (2):120-4 Clin. Microbiol. Infect.Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious DiseasesDOI
10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02699.xPubMed ID
19291143Abstract
Recent efforts to combat infections have focused on pharmaceutical interventions. However, the global spread of antimicrobial resistance calls for the reappraisal of personal and institutional hygiene. Hygiene embodies behavioural and procedural rules that prevent bacterial transmission. Consequently, the chance of spreading bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is significantly reduced. Hygiene is part of the primacy and totality of patient care, ensuring that no harm is done. Any prevention and control strategy must be underpinned by changes in attitude, embraced by all. The major components of preventing and controlling MRSA include hand and environmental hygiene (as part of standard precautions), patient isolation, and patient/staff decolonization. Improving hand hygiene practice is especially important where the risk of infection is highest, e.g. in intensive care. Physical isolation has two advantages: the physical barrier interrupts transmission, and this barrier emphasizes that precautions are required. With limited isolation facilities, risk assessment should be conducted to indicate which patients should be isolated. Environmental hygiene, although important, has a lower priority than standard precautions. When a patient is ready for discharge (home) or transfer (to another healthcare facility), the overall interests of the patient should take priority. All patients should be informed of their MRSA-positive status as soon as possible. Because of increased mupirocin resistance, a selective approach to decolonization should be taken. When MRSA-positive staff are identified, restricting their professional activity will depend on the nature of their work. Finally, politicians and others need to commit to providing the necessary resources to maximize MRSA prevention and control.Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1469-0691ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02699.x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit: which measures for which success?
- Authors: Lepelletier D, Corvec S, Caillon J, Reynaud A, Rozé JC, Gras-Leguen C
- Issue date: 2009 Apr
- Managing methicillin-resistant staphylococci: a paradigm for preventing nosocomial transmission of resistant organisms.
- Authors: Henderson DK
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Managing methicillin-resistant staphylococci: a paradigm for preventing nosocomial transmission of resistant organisms.
- Authors: Henderson DK
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- Monitoring and feedback of hand hygiene compliance and the impact on facility-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
- Authors: Cromer AL, Latham SC, Bryant KG, Hutsell S, Gansauer L, Bendyk HA, Steed R, Carney MC
- Issue date: 2008 Nov
- Do guidelines for the prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus make a difference?
- Authors: Humphreys H
- Issue date: 2009 Dec