Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. harewood.gavin@gmail.comIssue Date
2009-08MeSH
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeEndoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Endosonography
Health Resources
Humans
Retrospective Studies
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Resource-intensive endoscopy: revenue source or cash drain? 2009, 70 (2):272-7 Gastrointest. Endosc.Journal
Gastrointestinal endoscopyDOI
10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.008PubMed ID
19386305Abstract
Recent research has demonstrated that resource-intensive endoscopic procedures are not financially viable if performed without the need for further clinical care.To determine whether the net income from downstream clinical activities makes resource-intensive endoscopy a financially viable activity.
Retrospective database review.
Tertiary-referral medical center.
Patients whose initial contacts with the medical center were as outpatients who underwent EUS, EMR, or ERCP in 2004.
Hospital charges, the cost of providing services, revenue, and net income from all services provided through June 2006.
A total of 120 patients were reviewed whose initial procedure was EUS (48), ERCP (53), or EMR (19). Although income was lost by performing the endoscopic procedures, revenue was generated by the subsequent clinical care derived from EUS (mean $7093 per patient, standard deviation [SD] $23,686, range $12,316-$117,984 per patient); a loss of revenue was incurred in the clinical care of both patients who underwent ERCP (mean -$5028 per patient, SD $12,565, range -$33,648-$47,481) and patients who underwent EMR (mean -$931 per patient, SD $6515, range -$11,245-$12,196). The most lucrative activity arising from initial endoscopic referral was surgery. Revenue was lost for these procedures in Medicare patients compared with non-Medicare patients.
Indirect costs are institution specific and may not be generalizable to other centers.
EUS is the most remunerative resource-intensive endoscopic procedure. Centralizing these resource-intensive procedures into multispecialty practice sites that provide surgical and oncologic care allows downstream revenue from patient treatment to offset procedural losses. Even taking account of downstream revenues, performing these procedures on Medicare patients is not financially viable. Any future cuts in Medicare physician payment rates will further increase this Medicare/non-Medicare reimbursement imbalance and likely have consequences on the performance of these procedures.
Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1097-6779ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.008