Prospective, controlled assessment of the impact of formal evidence-based medicine teaching workshop on ability to appraise the medical literature.
dc.contributor.author | Harewood, G C | |
dc.contributor.author | Hendrick, L M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-06T14:06:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-06T14:06:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Prospective, controlled assessment of the impact of formal evidence-based medicine teaching workshop on ability to appraise the medical literature. 2010, 179 (1):91-4 Ir J Med Sci | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1863-4362 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19707728 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11845-009-0411-8 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10147/127466 | |
dc.description.abstract | The ability to critically appraise the calibre of studies in medical literature is increasingly important for medical professionals. | |
dc.description.abstract | This prospective controlled study evaluated the impact of a 6-h Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Workshop on the critical appraisal skills of medical trainees. | |
dc.description.abstract | Individuals attended three 2-h workshops over a 3-week period, incorporating didactic lectures in statistics, clinical trial design, appraising research papers and practical examples. Appraisal skills were assessed pre- and post-training based on grading the quality of randomised control studies (level 1 evidence), cohort studies (level 2 evidence) and case-control studies (level 3 evidence) [From Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence (2001), http://www.cebm.net/critical_appraisal.asp ]. | |
dc.description.abstract | Overall grading improved from 39% (pre-course) to 74% (post-course), P = 0.002, with grading of levels 1, 2 and 3 studies improving from 42 to 75%, 53 to 61% and 21 to 84%, respectively. | |
dc.description.abstract | We conclude that a 6-h formal EBM workshop is effective in enhancing the critical appraisal skills of medical trainees. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Prospective, controlled assessment of the impact of formal evidence-based medicine teaching workshop on ability to appraise the medical literature. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. harewood.gavin@gmail.com | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Irish journal of medical science | en |
dc.description.province | Leinster | |
html.description.abstract | The ability to critically appraise the calibre of studies in medical literature is increasingly important for medical professionals. | |
html.description.abstract | This prospective controlled study evaluated the impact of a 6-h Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Workshop on the critical appraisal skills of medical trainees. | |
html.description.abstract | Individuals attended three 2-h workshops over a 3-week period, incorporating didactic lectures in statistics, clinical trial design, appraising research papers and practical examples. Appraisal skills were assessed pre- and post-training based on grading the quality of randomised control studies (level 1 evidence), cohort studies (level 2 evidence) and case-control studies (level 3 evidence) [From Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence (2001), http://www.cebm.net/critical_appraisal.asp ]. | |
html.description.abstract | Overall grading improved from 39% (pre-course) to 74% (post-course), P = 0.002, with grading of levels 1, 2 and 3 studies improving from 42 to 75%, 53 to 61% and 21 to 84%, respectively. | |
html.description.abstract | We conclude that a 6-h formal EBM workshop is effective in enhancing the critical appraisal skills of medical trainees. |