Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVarley, J
dc.contributor.authorFitzsimons, M
dc.contributor.authorDelanty, N
dc.contributor.authorCollins, C
dc.contributor.authorBoland, M
dc.contributor.authorNormand, C
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-06T14:05:26Z
dc.date.available2011-04-06T14:05:26Z
dc.date.issued2009-06
dc.identifier.citationEpilepsy care in general practice. 2009, 102 (6):173-6 Ir Med Jen
dc.identifier.issn0332-3102
dc.identifier.pmid19722352
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/127442
dc.description.abstractEpilepsy care in Ireland is shared between primary, secondary and tertiary care services with the General Practitioner (GP) managing the process. Barriers to effective epilepsy care in Irish general practice remain undocumented although sub-optimal and fragmented services are frequently anecdotally reported. This survey of Irish GPs reports on such barriers to epilepsy care and on the Information & Communication Technology (ICT) issues potentially relevant to the use of an epilepsy specific Electronic Patient Record (EPR). The response rate was 247/700 (35.3%). Respondents supported the concept of shared care for epilepsy 237 (96%) however they were very dissatisfied with existing neurology services, including pathways of referral 207 (84%) and access to specialist neurology advice and investigations 232 (94%). They reported that neurology services and investigations may be accessed more expeditiously by patients with private health insurance than those without 178 (72%). Consequently many patients are referred to the emergency department for assessment and treatment 180 (73%). A deficit in epilepsy care expertise among GPs was acknowledged 86 (35%). While computerisation of GP practices appears widespread 230 (93%), just over half the respondents utilise available electronic functionalities specific to chronic disease management. GP specific electronic systems infrequently link or communicate with external electronic sources 133 (54%). While the current pathways of care for epilepsy in Ireland appear fragmented and inadequate, further investigations to determine the quality and cost effectiveness of the current service are required.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshContinuity of Patient Care
dc.subject.meshDelivery of Health Care
dc.subject.meshEpilepsy
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHealth Care Surveys
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIreland
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshNeurology
dc.subject.meshPhysician's Practice Patterns
dc.subject.meshPhysicians, Family
dc.subject.meshPrimary Health Care
dc.subject.meshQuestionnaires
dc.subject.meshReferral and Consultation
dc.titleEpilepsy care in general practice.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentEpilepsy Programme, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9. jarlathvarley@beaumont.ieen
dc.identifier.journalIrish medical journalen
dc.description.provinceLeinster
html.description.abstractEpilepsy care in Ireland is shared between primary, secondary and tertiary care services with the General Practitioner (GP) managing the process. Barriers to effective epilepsy care in Irish general practice remain undocumented although sub-optimal and fragmented services are frequently anecdotally reported. This survey of Irish GPs reports on such barriers to epilepsy care and on the Information & Communication Technology (ICT) issues potentially relevant to the use of an epilepsy specific Electronic Patient Record (EPR). The response rate was 247/700 (35.3%). Respondents supported the concept of shared care for epilepsy 237 (96%) however they were very dissatisfied with existing neurology services, including pathways of referral 207 (84%) and access to specialist neurology advice and investigations 232 (94%). They reported that neurology services and investigations may be accessed more expeditiously by patients with private health insurance than those without 178 (72%). Consequently many patients are referred to the emergency department for assessment and treatment 180 (73%). A deficit in epilepsy care expertise among GPs was acknowledged 86 (35%). While computerisation of GP practices appears widespread 230 (93%), just over half the respondents utilise available electronic functionalities specific to chronic disease management. GP specific electronic systems infrequently link or communicate with external electronic sources 133 (54%). While the current pathways of care for epilepsy in Ireland appear fragmented and inadequate, further investigations to determine the quality and cost effectiveness of the current service are required.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record