The Beckman DxI 800 prolactin assay demonstrates superior specificity for monomeric prolactin.
Affiliation
Department of Chemical Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. brendanbyrne@beaumont.ieIssue Date
2010-02MeSH
Chemical PrecipitationChromatography, Gel
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Hyperprolactinemia
Immunoassay
Male
Polyethylene Glycols
Prolactin
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
The Beckman DxI 800 prolactin assay demonstrates superior specificity for monomeric prolactin. 2010, 48 (2):205-8 Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.Journal
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine : CCLM / FESCCDOI
10.1515/CCLM.2010.038PubMed ID
19943807Abstract
Commercially available prolactin immunoassays detect macroprolactin to variable degrees. Best practice requires laboratories to assess the cross-reactivity of their prolactin assay with macroprolactin, and where appropriate, introduce a screen for the presence of macroprolactin. Our policy has been to reanalyse hyperprolactinaemic samples following polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and to report the resultant value as the monomeric prolactin content of the sample. The goal of this study was to determine the need to continue PEG precipitation when prolactin measurements with the Wallac AutoDELFIA were replaced by the Beckman DxI 800.A total of 317 apparently hyperprolactinaemic samples were analysed for prolactin using the Beckman DxI 800 and results compared with those determined with the PEG screening technique on the Wallac AutoDELFIA. Any samples demonstrating a discordance of >25% were re-analysed using gel filtration chromatography (GFC) for a definitive result.
The results indicate the Beckman DxI overestimates the prolactin concentration in 1%-2% of hyperprolactinaemic samples. PEG precipitation prior to analysis with the Wallac AutoDELFIA resulted in a 1% false negative diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia.
Prolactin results can be reported directly from the DxI. When results are discordant with the clinical presentation, prolactin should be measured using GFC.
Item Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1434-6621ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1515/CCLM.2010.038
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Serum prolactin revisited: parametric reference intervals and cross platform evaluation of polyethylene glycol precipitation-based methods for discrimination between hyperprolactinemia and macroprolactinemia.
- Authors: Overgaard M, Pedersen SM
- Issue date: 2017 Oct 26
- False-positive polyethylene glycol precipitation tests for macroprolactin due to increased serum globulins.
- Authors: Ram S, Harris B, Fernando JJ, Gama R, Fahie-Wilson M
- Issue date: 2008 May
- Importance of screening for macroprolactin in all hyperprolactinaemic sera.
- Authors: Jamaluddin FA, Sthaneshwar P, Hussein Z, Othman N, Chan SP
- Issue date: 2013 Jun
- Determination of prolactin: the macroprolactin problem.
- Authors: Fahie-Wilson M, Smith TP
- Issue date: 2013 Oct
- Roche Elecsys Prolactin II assay: reactivity with macroprolactin compared with eight commercial assays for prolactin and determination of monomeric prolactin by precipitation with polyethylene glycol.
- Authors: Fahie-Wilson M, Bieglmayer C, Kratzsch J, Nusbaumer C, Roth HJ, Zaninotto M, Plebani M, Hubbuch A, Schneider E
- Issue date: 2007